Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

چپ‌کوک

@chapkook

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,030subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001085004750
TypeChannel
Username@chapkook
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chapkook

Growth

1,0241,0301,0276 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,023–1,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:041,030+6
9 Aug 2026, 14:151,024-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:521,026-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:041,027no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:221,027first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.5%
avg views ÷ 1,030 subscribers
Avg views / post
592
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 June 202522 July 2026)
Views total1,776
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC515 viewsread 6 August 2026

متن گفتگوی من با سایت مهستان درباره ورود سلبریتی‌ها به عرصه تولید کتاب و تاثیر آن بر فضای صنعت نشر، کتاب و کتابخوانی

Signed Atoosa Afshinnavid

18 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC641 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Akhbare_mahestan

‍ 🔸در جستجوی ذهن زیبایی برای نوشتن در میان سلبریتی‌ها مهستان؛ وارد کردن چهره های مشهور به عرصه نویسندگی و ترجمه توسط برخی از ناشران، برای کسانی که مقوله کتاب را فراتر از تفنن می دانند دغدغه آفرین شده است. چرا که این تلقی در میان ایشان وجود دارد که عرصه کتاب فی نفسه آنقدر مهم است که اهالی آن، اعم از نویسندگان و مترجمان، بالقوه چهره هایی قابل اعتنا و صاحب نام هستند و حوزه کتاب نیاز به سلبریتی وارداتی از دیگر حوزه های

Signed Atoosa Afshinnavid

22 Jun 2026, 08:34 UTC≈2,230 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

از انقلاب مشروطه تا امروز چهاربار نظام سیاسی ایران تغییر کرده بی‌انکه رویای جمهوریت محقق شود. ما در این ناکامی تنها نیستیم مردمان خاورمیانه تجربه مشابهی دارند. انقلاب هنوز برای عده‌‌ای پیروزی، برای عده‌ای شکست و برای گروه لکه شرم است. ما در این گیجی تنها نیستیم. تحریم خشونتی فرسایشی و تحقیری مداوم بر ما تحمیل کرده است. ما در این تجربه تنها نیستیم. ما در تجربه نگاه‌کردن یا نکردن به فلسطین، به رسمیت شناختن یا نشناختن ا

Signed Atoosa Afshinnavid

15 Jun 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

انسان خاورمیانه امروز، انسان مستاصلی‌ست. نه فقط برای بار سنگینی که بر دوش دارد و خشونتی که در آن گرفتار است، بلکه از آن‌رو که خود را در این بدبختی تنها می‌بیند. انسان خاورمیانه امروز از یاد برده است که زمانی نه چندان دور عاشقانه‌ترین ترنم‌ها و بی‌پایان‌ترین قصه‌ها مثل رودهای خروشان این منطقه میان سرزمین‌ها جاری بود. به‌گمانم اگر ما همسایگان بتوانیم دوباره همدیگر را بشناسیم و به یاد بیاوریم علیرغم تفاوت‌هایمان میراث م

Signed Atoosa Afshinnavid

4 May 2026, 04:30 UTC≈2,920 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://telegra.ph/273-05-04

Signed Atoosa Afshinnavid

1 Feb 2026, 05:54 UTC≈5,700 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://telegra.ph/271-02-01

Signed Atoosa Afshinnavid

27 Jan 2026, 10:13 UTC≈4,110 viewsread 6 August 2026

چسبیده‌ام کنج بالایی اتاقم و از آن بالا به میز تحریرم نگاه می‌کنم. به یادداشت‌ها، نسخه بیست و چند کتابی که قرار است حرفی تازه از دلشان در بیاید، به ارکیده که بعد از دو سال دوباره غنچه بسته، به لیوان قهوه که پر و خالی می‌شود و به کالبدی که در این اتاق زندانی‌‌ست. پرسه می‌زند، می‌نویسد، پشت پنجره می‌رود، با ارکیده حرف می‌زند، دست نوازشی بر سر گربه می‌کشد و دوباره پشت میز می‌نشیند و به خودش می‌گوید بنویس. این کتاب را تم

Signed Atoosa Afshinnavid

2 Jan 2026, 06:01 UTC≈1,880 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://telegra.ph/269-01-02-4

Signed Atoosa Afshinnavid

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chapkook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,002,431 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چپ‌کوک” (@chapkook), 1,030 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chapkook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.