Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ChaosNavigator

@chaosnavigator

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

234subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001382329338
TypeChannel
Username@chaosnavigator
Created3 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chaosnavigator

Growth

233234233.57 Aug 2026, 05:18 — 233 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:22 — 234 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:187 Aug 2026, 14:22
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 14:22234+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:18233first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.8%
avg views ÷ 234 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.1
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (10 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total639
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC159 viewsread 7 August 2026

Minister bekræfter lov om fodlænke på ustraffede PET skal kunne pege på farlige radikaliserede, som kan få fodlænke og kontaktforbud, selv om de ikke er dømt Af /ritzau/ Regeringen vil fremsætte et lovforslag, der kan give mulighed for at sætte fodlænke på ustraffede personer, hvis det vurderes, at de er særligt farlige og radikaliserede. Det bekræfter justitsminister Nicolai Wammen (S) i et skriftligt svar over fo

2 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrMikeYeadon

https://youtu.be/Na14H6xtI_w ... This is centrally important in installing the control grid or “digital prison”, as Catherine Austin Fitts terms it. Best wishes and thanks to Chris for posting it. Mike 👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

31 Jul 2026, 01:39 UTC45 viewsread 7 August 2026

Lidt pep-talk fra Anthony Hopkins: Tro fuldstændigt på dig selv, også når du ikke føler, det er sandt. Lad ikke andres vurderinger definere dig. Stop med at acceptere etiketter som "du kan ikke". Modgang kan blive begyndelsen på dit egentlige liv. Et enkelt vendepunkt kan ændre hele din fremtid. __ Essensen af hele transskriptet kan sammenfattes i én sætning: Livet bliver lettere og friere, når man holder op

31 Jul 2026, 00:46 UTC56 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/cUMUhueo4AA?si=UHMF3BwNR5Ki-xNz ___ Her er en neutral og detaljeret dansk opsummering af samtalen mellem Donald Hoffman og Andrew Gallimore om DMT, bevidsthed, bevidste agenter og deres fælles teoretiske ramme. Baseret på den uploadede transskription: Donald Hoffman og Andrew Gallimore kommer fra forskellige felter – henholdsvis matematisk bevidsthedsteori og neurovidenskab – men de mener, at dere

30 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrMikeYeadon

https://youtu.be/1HZdTms9A7A This woman gets it. Best wishes Mike 👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

30 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC30 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://off-guardian.org/2026/07/29/quick-take-the-fauci-diaries-and-the-lab-leak-renaissance/

30 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC68 viewsread 7 August 2026

Quick Take… Fauci-dagbøgerne og lab leak-renæssancen Kit Knightly Dr. Anthony Fauci afgiver i dag vidneforklaring foran Kongressen. På den anden side sidder hans mangeårige modstander Rand Paul, bevæbnet med belastende e-mails og angiveligt uddrag fra Faucis personlige dagbog, skrevet mellem 2019 og 2022. Pludselig taler alle igen om Covids mystiske oprindelse. Velkendte navne og udtryk som Wuhan Institute of Viro

30 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC74 viewsread 7 August 2026

"Hvad du skal bemærke er, at begge disse angiveligt modsatrettede sider er enige om det vigtigste aspekt af pandemiens løgn – at Covid er en unik ny og farlig sygdom, som skal behandles med masker, lockdowns og vacciner – og kun er voldsomt uenige om, hvor denne "virkelige og dødelige nye sygdom" kunne være kommet fra. Det er meningen, at du skal tage udgangspunkt i dette. De vil have dig til at glemme, at "covid"

26 Jul 2026, 01:07 UTC56 viewsread 7 August 2026

Sad, but true. Since the Covid fiasco, I’ve seen the true nature of people—or at least the nature they were willing to show once the fear got turned up and the herd started moving. Most of them are still firmly under the sheep banner, content to graze wherever they’re told. A small handful stand under the “critical thinker” banner. Those are the ones I still trust. https://off-guardian.org/2026/07/25/i-no-longer-trus

23 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026

Dr Zoe Harcombe did a meta analysis of various "trials" This is her link, ( she will never let 1 statin pass her lips) https://www.zoeharcombe.com/2015/03/worried-about-cholesterol- andor-statins/ She is a Co Author on this book. Sorry it’s Amazon🤯 https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cholesterol-Cause-Attacks-Statins-Solution-ebook/dp/B01LZHKRD8/ref=pd_lutyp_im_d_sccl_1_3/257-1253288-9289930 Also apology and damages from co

23 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC45 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrMikeYeadonsolochannelPhoto

Canterbury, Kent, England. July 22, 2026. Around 4pm. This is a very odd pattern. I’m guessing that’s formed from the ground using a system that is broadcasting low frequency, high wavelength and powerful signals, sufficient to cause regular patterns extending miles across the sky. I counted twenty bands. Five minutes later, if that, they’ve all gone. Best wishes Mike

13 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC219 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

BREAKING: Pro-palæstinensiske aktivister har afbrudt en præsentation af Werner Vogels, Amazons vicepræsident og teknologidirektør (CTO), under FN's topmøde "AI for Good" i Schweiz. Det palæstinensiske civilsamfund fordømmer på det kraftigste FN's Internationale Teleunions (ITU) skamfulde partnerskab med teknologivirksomheder, som de betegner som kriminelle, i forbindelse med dette topmøde – særligt Microsoft, Amazon

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chaosnavigator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ChaosNavigator” (@chaosnavigator), 234 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaosnavigator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.