Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Пристанище речей

@channel_vince

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

81subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001415982160
TypeChannel
Username@channel_vince
DescriptionЭто канал, в котором я выкладываю изящно выраженные мысли (не обязательно свои). Админ: @Hasan_vince
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/channel_vince

Growth

817 August 2026 — 81 subscribers9 August 2026 — 81 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:4581no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2581first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.8%
avg views ÷ 81 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 December 20257 August 2026)
Views total70
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1644.4%
🔥1336.1%
616.7%
💯12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC16 viewsread 9 August 2026

Желание выставлять свою красоту и получать одобрения зачастую связаны с комплексами человека. Но по какой-то не понятной причине "закомплексованным" называют того, кто велит этого не делать #феминизм #арбузер

5 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC23 viewsread 9 August 2026

Одно из лицемерных проявлений грешников и вероотступников это слова "не навязывайте нам своё мнение". Причем сами они могут навязывать свою мерзость и это они будут называть "свободой слова" и "высказыванием своего мнения". #атеисты #муртады #лицемеры #двойные #стандарты

4 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Какую бы общественную проблему не подняли в сети интернет, найдутся амёбы, которые скажут "что у нас больше проблем нет, посмотрите на ..."

💯1

5 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC76 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Не надо навязывать нам чужую культуру" сказали неверующие и запретили никаб. Тем самым навязывая другим свою культуру. #никаб #культура

👍1

21 Jun 2026, 11:43 UTC106 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Нынче женщины, перекроившие ради внимания людей лицо пластиком, ботексом и шпаклевкой, смеют осуждать женщин, скрывших ради Аллах1а своё лицо тканью. #никаб #культура

👍1

17 Jun 2026, 09:39 UTC112 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @al_faraidu

Человек, говорящий на чужом языке, одевающийся в европейскую одежду, смотрящий западные фильмы, перенявший их культуру и восприятие мира, на полном серьёзе видит самой большой угрозой арабизацию своей страны... #thoughts

👍3

11 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC124 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Евреи - избранный Богом народ. Как видим по сионистам, они избранны гореть в аду.

👍1

10 Jun 2026, 09:30 UTC116 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Задайте атеисту вопрос "Какой самый сильный аргумент, который ты не принял, ты слышал от верующих" и вы услышите что-то, связанное с эмоциями, а не с логикой. К примеру "А почему есть зло в этом мире?" или "Почему Бог не показывает мне себя?" (Как будто бы Бог обязан ему себя показать, а не он искать Его). И это показывает, что проблема атеистов не в недостатке доказательств, а в банальной обиде на Бога. #атеизм

🔥4👍1

10 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Когда русский человек становится атеистом, то никто из его сородичей не осуждают его. "Это его выбор", "Главное что человек хороший" твердят они. Но стоит этому человеку стать мусульманином, то он становится для них предателем, которые отказался от веры предков. #атеизм #русские #двойные #стандарты

🔥4

21 May 2026, 08:17 UTC111 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Те, кто использует женское тело во всех сверах маркетинга как объект и развили куплю/продажу женщин на отдельный уровень рынка, обвиняют многоженцев в том, что они слишком похотливы из-за того, что хотят разрешённое им Богом. Запретное и вызывающее похоть сделали нормой. Разрешённое и защищающее от похоти называют преступлением. #многоженцы #феминистки #исламофобы

🔥4

14 Feb 2026, 16:59 UTC200 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Когда кто-то скажет вам, что простые израильтяне не виноваты в тех ужасах, что творятся в Газе. Напомните о словах, которые сами евреи любят говорить: "Израиль единственная демократическая страна на Ближнем Востоке" #выборы #онисамивыбрали

👍4

11 Feb 2026, 16:58 UTC187 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Революции всегда удачные, в то время как все мятежи провалились" @

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @channel_vince. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 848,587 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пристанище речей” (@channel_vince), 81 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/channel_vince.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.