Voice message, posted without a caption
Signed AbDuVoRiS

Channel
@chakalakzor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001461481885 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chakalakzor |
| Created | 25 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chakalakzor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 25 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 28 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 28 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Voice message, posted without a caption
Signed AbDuVoRiS
Millionni konsertlarida kulishadiyu jag'lari yirtilib ketay deguncha, o'shanaqa qilib qaysi mavzularda kular ekanmaney?!)) @Chakalakzor
Signed Тимур
Erkak tasdiqlanmaguncha jinoyatchi, vaxshiy va tajovuzkor. Ayol-qizlar tasdiqlanmaguncha qurbon, jabrdiyda va aybsiz. (Tushinish qiyin bo'lsa ham miyyangning bir burchagiga muhrlab qo'y.) Kerak bo'ladi. @Chalalakzor
Signed Тимур
Chiroq o'chib qoladigan vaqtlarni sog'inaman deb o'ylamagandim😅
Signed Тимур
So'nggi 2-3 asr erkaklarga juda qattiq kelmoqda. Nega bunday bo'lyapti? Erkaklarning necha asrlar davomidirki dominantlik qiluvchi tarafi kuch - jinoyat hisoblanadi. Hozirgi, 21-asr psixologiya asri bo'lib qolmoqda, kimdirlar informaciya asri deydi, lekin, bu shak-shubhasiz psixologiya asri. Psixologiya borasida xohlang xohlamang ayol va qizlarga yetib olishga erkaklarning bu asrdagi yoshi yetmaydi. So'nggi 5-6 yild…
Signed Тимур
Ikkitasi Messi yo Ronaldu zo'rligini talashishyotgandi, biraaam maza qilib kulibmanee😆 @Chakalakzor
Signed Тимур
Kuzatma!
Signed Тимур
-Dunyoda bor xalqning 0.02 foizi aktyor, qolgan barcha odamlar ularning kuzatuvchilari xolos. Ahmoqlar. @Chakalakzor
Signed Тимур
O'zi ko'p narsa kutmasang nimagadir na afsuslanasan, lekin, quvonch hissi katta bo'ladigandek...
Signed Тимур
Bizdagilar shunaqayam orzumandmiye?
Signed Тимур
-Nima qilsang ham qattiq o'rganib qolma! Shunaqa davrga kelib qoldik.
👍1
Signed Тимур
Ba'zi narsalarni bilmay tushinmay boshlagan maqul.
Signed Тимур
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chakalakzor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@chakalakzor named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chakalakzor” (@chakalakzor), 25 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chakalakzor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.