Channel
@chaechaezpostage
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002599561948 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chaechaezpostage |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chaechaezpostage |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 159 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 157 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 156 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 156 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 February 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 641 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
24 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @imvninsyrh 650867174868 @qayyahzzz 650865894131 @KimpoJun 650867874071 @valerieeeleong 650855922212 @zahirahang 650867145789 @rymura 650864705748 @emilyllaa 650862467324 @dyazmi 650863215933 @vintagemia 650862353232 @xiaoqingg_13 650861461792 @akhairen 650867624834 @nkpeng 650866635832 If your parcel arrived pls put your feedback in comment🥺
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @tingwei_10 650863542270 @draptor021 650864733543 If your parcel arrived pls put your feedback in comment🥺
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @minttddeonu 650864344862 @AkuZaru 650866932885 @hyoonqwi 650866659629 @A4lippp 650863034144 @xvnlingg 650859624687 @geoniedori 650866855298 @zuryn 650864554981 @hnifnajmi 650866748277 If your parcel arrived pls put your feedback in comment🥺
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @naufaliman 650862572676 @nyyyny0 650856723964 @dlwlychu 650857986654 @xiaoqingg_13 650863522112 @dfzayn 650859446047 @haezsieyra 650864212310 @zjzj288 650851537013 @xuann_85 650863872488 @mariamohdredzal 650861956399 @yushisushisoup 650840405679 @Choong_Mun_Ho 650864937456 @aenjlle 650861508605 @shfxxh_h 650863947223 @zzzuluf 650862929197 @urusanxrasmi 650854298574 @imeniacx 65086…
❤2
will postout next week
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @rin2305 650859493113 @syrhyjs 650860055089 @dnshkf 650861713515 If your parcel arrived pls put your feedback in comment🥺
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @atikahnakjay 650856240246 Yan Tong 650860242362 @rin2305 650859296799 @irdxnax 650855780545 @Lunarabl00m 650859082147 @asyannzr 650860741199 @samantha_van 650859278162 If your parcel arrived pls put your feedback in comment🥺
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @dihahoon 650853419940 @ctyluvn 650852877998 @isnotqi 650844151987 @Emr_azz 650852326011 @machuew 650856850109 @marioluigi4ever 650851841945 @farishairdina 650858214689 @odahiee 650857687318 @mochalyaa 650852411025 @kayqing09 650858081015 @nurbbina 650856197545 @syfkh_mlk 650855608932 @dihahoon 650855444967 @ifayahmin 650858223613 @ch0usf 650857454659 @iffah_njhh 650858112698 @Choo…
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @Irsyad01_4 650850265826 @qiann10 650848437856 @dahyununnie 650850414861 @Azhari_06 650850150516 @olivialim08 650855742403 @alyyshd 650848345284 @eanadmia 650856428193 @atikahnakjay 650855776180 @shfxxh_h 650855761790 @beng_112 650856413536 @seeraasea 650856197032 @mrbchoc 650854251843 @sinleiiiiii 650851737713 @fyrishh 650850263020 @farishairdina 650856610947 @imvninsyrh 650855008…
❤1
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @jaywaypeh 650836681899 @marioluigi4ever 650853750208 @Lunarabl00m 650854130732 @izinieyo 650852736758 @anl7drm 650854464277 @heeenie 650853666023 @rrrmuii 650853387721 @xxc_07 650854190172 If your parcel arrived pls put your feedback in comment🥺
😍1
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @ninaaur 650853138646 @valerieeeleong 650852231745 @moothiesw 650852573136 @anisssmai 650853089423 @leiakhan 650849230513 @ilovefoodnotu 650853481230 @jinniesseo 650852525371 @jjyuukyyu 650852001555 @cvcoola 650852423208 @yraf4 650853221158 650852820988 @jellywifi 650848764677 @hrts4riku 650852540720 @Janice_TwT 650853424121 @ryannn_100318 650852619236 @hsuenzzz25 650850400033 @hae…
❤5
JNT Tracking Number📦 (tap to copy) @sarahnrl 650846636830 @evonriki 650850658818 @qstinnah 650849368241 @ribboncharms 650848967891 @odahiee 650845108232 @atikahnakjay 650843429061 @awekhanyujin 650847292653 @jaemingwnana 650849370940 @Chenzhe0616 650832015314 @khdjmr 650850870485 @eeseooes2 650843691593 @paleshade11 650831072908 @s_lxc 650845021592 @jojonnis 650848364042 @chanchan_chanie 650848828333 @mariamohdredza…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chaechaezpostage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 109,136 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@chaechaezpostage named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Postage-Chaechaez” (@chaechaezpostage), 159 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaechaezpostage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.