Channel
@ch_naghash
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004428882659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ch_naghash |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 24 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ch_naghash |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 2 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 3 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 3 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (24 July 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 162 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
طبق نگاهی که به چنلتون داشتم متوجه شدم یک چنل دوستانه هست و چند نفرید و نقطه قوت چنل دوستی شما و آهنگ های قشنگتون هست 🫶🏻🎵 اما میخام راجب زینب کسی که فور زده و طبق چتاش نقطه قوت شخصیتش رو بگم یک دختر مهربون و قوی هست که از دل تاریکی، امید و عشق رو میشه در اون دید زخم هاشو ترمیم کرده و همچنان به زندگی امید داره و شخصیت جالبی داره دوسش داشتم 🩷 https://t.me/partediiimee
نقطه قوت، در توانایی تو در زیبا سازی غم است تو فقط خاطرات را مرور نمیکنی بلکه با استفاده از طلوع آفتاب و موسیقی به آن لحظات روح جدیدی میبخشی تو نشون دادی با مرور خاطرات تلخ نیز هم میتوان ذوق اندکی راجب طلوع و زیبایی داشت(طبق عکس های چنلت و ذوقی ک نوشتی : هنوز لذت میبری از اون عکس) 🪷☀️ https://t.me/HK_Channel88
نقطه قوت کانال تو، توانایی در ساختن یک دنیای منسجم از تکه های پراکنده هست، تو یک کلکسیونر احساسات هستی که قطعات درخشان دیالوگ های سینمایی، جملات کتاب هارو جمع میکنی و در فضای آرام و آبی قرار میدی ترکیب این محتواها با لطافت گربه ها، هویت متفکرانه ای به کانالت داده که وایب کتابخونه دنج رو داره 🩵🐈 https://t.me/bluemeows
نقاشی هات بازتابی از درونت هستن و نقطه قوت کانالت همون لطافت و ظرافتی هست که در نقاشی هات به خرج دادی انگار که با هرخطی که میکشی عشق میدی به کاغذ و در نهایت اثر فوق العاده خلق میکنی🎨❣ https://t.me/Goli_1
این پیام رو فور بزن چنلت بیام نقطه قوت چنلت رو بگم 💫🎀 جوین باشی قشنگترِ ♡ Limit:10
جدا از اینکه نقاشی هات واقعا خیره کننده هست، مخصوصا هاشور های تمیزی که میزنی، چیزی که جلب توجه میکنه خاکی بودن تو هست، اینکه کنار هنرت انقد رفیقی با بچه های کانالت و حرف میزنی، کانالت رو به یک پاتوق گرم و صمیمی که هم میشه نقاشی دید و هم پیشنهاد های جذاب دید تبدیل کرده و صمیمیت تو و نقاشی هات بزرگترین نقطه قوت تو هست 🌞🤍 https://t.me/sanazarti
سبک دیجیتال آرتت و اون تسلطی که روی رنگ بندی و جزئیات کارات داری فوق العاده اس ی نکته کوچولو که به ذهنم رسید اینه که تعداد پست هات یکم زیاده و اون آرت های خفنت لابه لای پست های دیگه گم میشه و حیف این همه دقت و ظرافت نقاشی هات سریع از جلوی چشم رد بشه نقطه قوت تو در ترسیم جزئیات آرت هات هست 🪄🧡 https://t.me/thsketcher2004
چیزی که تورو از جاهای دیگه متمایز میکنه حس زندگی تو حرفات و رنگای تو نقاشی هات هست اینکه رنگ بنفش رو معرف خودت گذاشتی یه فضای خاص ایجاد میکنه که مخاطب حس شادابی میگیره سرزندگی تو و آرت های قشنگت نقطه قوت تو هست 💜🪻 https://t.me/Diigital_Arrt
❤1
نقطه قوت و جادویی کانال تو در پیدا کردن زیبایی در چیز های ساده و روزمره هست این وایب کلاسیک و نوستالژی که تو عکس هات از گل گرفته تا جزئیات اتاقت هست یک مکان آرامش بخش ایجاد کرده و نه تنها عکس های قشنگ میگیری بلکه اون حس زیبایی و لطافت رو به مخاطب انتقال میدی 🤎🧸 https://t.me/MyDiariesdina
کانالت وایب مثبت داره یه جور حس خوب و امن اینکه چطور متن کتاب رو با نور شمع و عکس های قشنگت ترکیب میکنی واقعا هنرمندانه هست انگار داری میگی زیبایی توی جزئیات کوچک و مهربون زندگی پنهان شده نقطه قوت تو این هست که با ساده ترین چیزها مثل شمع و یک جمله کتاب یه اتمسفر مثبت میسازی 🪐✨ https://t.me/maybe00dd
کانال تو دقیقا مثل همان جوانه ای که با تمام قدرت داره از دل خاک میاد بالا تا به دنیا ثابت کنه زندگی یعنی شکوفایی ترکیب کلمات پرشور و عکس های باحالت یکی انرژی ایجاد کرده که هرکسی دنبال امید میگرده تو چنل میتونه پیداش کنه نقطه قوت تو امید و جوانه است 🌱💚 https://t.me/Saram_chnl
نقطه قوت تو در هنر ستایش زیبایی زنانه و پیوند زدن کلام با تصویر هست تو به ظرافت زنانه و لطافت خیال هویت میبخشی. تو با کلماتت به خیال رنگ و عطر میدی و با نگات به زیبایی معنی میبخشی 🎀🩰 https://t.me/Chakamelimuii
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ch_naghash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 980,210 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صندوقچه نقاش کوچولو 🤍” (@ch_naghash), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ch_naghash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.