Channel
@cgaao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
12,295subscribers
+113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002585688209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cgaao |
| Description | 东南亚吃瓜 #吃瓜 #搞笑 #猎奇 #热搜 #抽象 #新闻 📮商务联系|🗑投稿删除 联系 👉 @cgaao1 近期有骗子冒充本频道主，与广告商讨论合作事宜。请认准唯一联系方式👆，谨防被骗！！！ 新闻曝光 @dnydsc 二手发布 @qqqwww9 东南亚DJ @djkke Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated the rules and policy of using Telegram. Please pay attention. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cgaao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 12,295 | +9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 12,286 | +24 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 12,262 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 12,250 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 12,246 | +44 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 12,202 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 12,193 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 12,182 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 12,182 | first reading |
114 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 114 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 114 (7 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,880 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
29 reactions across 26 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 72.4% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 13.8% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 13.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 114 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏪 【24H智能全自动能量闪兑机器人】 🎁 0.1 TRX 就能转一笔 USDT ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔋 转 0.1 TRX 到能量收款地址，秒送 65K 能量！ 💎 24小时自动闪兑TRX，秒级到账！ 👁 专属地址实时监控，笔笔流转秒推送！ 📊 实时查看最准确的U价汇率！ 🚀 资金安全无忧，用一次就会爱上的全能机器人！ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 点击直达机器人：@wl6688_bot ☎️ 认准唯一客服：@ootrx8
#王涵 #郑州工商学院 郑州工商学院 王涵 表面清纯女神 私下金主胯下母狗 看视频🌏 传送门
他到底叫什么名字啊 ？ 各位大学生
含苞待放 #夜店 #气氛组 #露出 真空出镜？
自(臭)信(不)大(要)方(脸)的集美，拒绝吊牌羞耻
今天，Telegram 迎来了它的 13 岁生日。
来，我看看有没有跟豆包一个水平的人
女同学的水杯
来，我看看有没有跟豆包一个水平的人
电车爆炸？
暑期档国产动画电影《牛来》，上映9天，票房7169元，共计236人观看 建模粗劣、剧情狗屎，不知道怎么过审拿到的龙标…
这娘们可真是个不折不扣的婊子
Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @cgaao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@cgaao edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚吃瓜|新闻曝光|爆料热搜” (@cgaao), 12,295 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cgaao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.