Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Карьерный Цех — продакты

@cf_product

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,987subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001503094794
TypeChannel
Username@cf_product
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cf_product

Growth

1,9871,9881,987.57 August 2026 — 1,988 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,988 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,987 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,987–1,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:241,987-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:281,988no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:461,988first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

189 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6735.4%
👍6132.3%
🔥5529.1%
👎42.12%
👌10.529%
🙏10.529%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2024 to 12 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
10.0%
2 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,110
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,310
over 15 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquZVdtr113 June 202413 June 2024
LjN8KMSpq118 March 202418 March 2024

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2024 to 12 August 2024. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

13 Jun 2024, 09:59 UTC≈4,740 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzquZVdtrPhoto

Серия подкастов Яндекса х make sense вышла целиком — это пять эпизодов бесед с нашими CPO В этом проекте основатель ProductSense Юра Агеев общается с CPO наших сервисов и узнаёт, как они делают продукты Яндекса. Мы выпустили заключительный эпизод и предлагаем проверить, не пропустили ли вы разговор об интересном для вас продукте или сервисе. А если вы слышите о нашем подкасте впервые, у вас есть уникальная возможно

9👍3🔥2

Signed Egor Fedorov

2 May 2024, 16:39 UTC≈4,340 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Конкурсы закончились, а развитие продолжается. Продуктовый кейс-клуб для тех, кто хочет прокачать продуктовую бицуху, дорого стоить и уметь порешать любую задачу Сделать несколько заданий, откликнуться на вакансии, подготовить хорошее резюме не достаточно, чтобы найти классную работу или продвинуться на текущем месте. Возможно, вы знаете, что мы параллельно делаем Карьерный Университет. Ну а если не значете, то зах

5

Signed Egor Fedorov

26 Apr 2024, 16:09 UTC≈2,780 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, весенние конкурсы КЦ подошли к концу. В этот этот вечер пятницы вам точно есть, что отметить 😎 Представляем вашему вниманию рейтинг 8 конкурса продактов. Дорогие участники, вы нереальные крутаны! Мы очень рады делать для вас увлекательные и полезные конкурсы снова и снова. Спасибо вам за то, что вдохновляете 🔥 И конечно же отдельная благодарность экспертам этого конкурса. Антон, Алексей- с вами конкурс бы

16🔥6👍2🙏1

Signed Alexandra

24 Apr 2024, 05:44 UTC≈2,440 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хэлоу! Мы ещё работаем, итоговый рейтинг планируем выкатить в течение 1-2 дней. Следите за постами в канале.

👍10🔥3👌1

Signed Alexandra

20 Apr 2024, 14:42 UTC≈2,420 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Напоминаем участникам конкурса, что завтра, 21 апреля в 23:59 дедлайн этапа проверки заданий Финальный рывок перед майскими (у нас тоже 😁) Однотипные работы, которые похожи на сделанные через chat gpt, оценивайте и ставьте галку «нарушает условия конкурса». Мы их посмотрим вручную. Всем пис ✌🏻

👍5

Signed Alexandra

17 Apr 2024, 12:30 UTC≈2,420 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Этап оценки работ открыт! Вы можете убедиться в этом на странице конкурса 😁 Дедлайн 21 апреля в 23:59. 🧠 Работы на проверку случайно распределены по участникам. Нужно проверить 10 работ в каждом доступном вам задании. 🦄 Нужно расставить работы, которые вам показываются в порядке убывания от лучшей к худшей. 🧠Оценка влияет на итоговый балл. Чем качественнее оцените, тем больше будет баллов → выше место в рейтинге.

6👍2

Signed Alexandra

17 Apr 2024, 07:07 UTC≈1,940 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ссылка на статью, которую Антон Куликов подготовил для разбора. Читайте, пользуйтесь😌

5

Signed Alexandra

16 Apr 2024, 16:02 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 7 August 2026

Трансляция началась! Всем велкам! Заходим, слушаем, задаем вопросы 🙂

Signed Alexandra

16 Apr 2024, 13:46 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет! Сегодня проводим стрим с разбором работ продактов 🧠 Стартуем в 19:00 мск по ссылке Присоединяйтесь, готовьте ваши вопросы!

Signed Alexandra

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cf_product. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Карьерный Цех — продакты” (@cf_product), 1,987 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cf_product.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.