Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Центр СФЕРА

Channel

Центр СФЕРА

@center_sphere

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

187subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001890148795
TypeChannel
Username@center_sphere
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/center_sphere

Growth

187190188.57 August 2026 — 190 subscribers8 August 2026 — 190 subscribers15 August 2026 — 189 subscribers21 August 2026 — 187 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 187–190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 13:57187-2
15 Aug 2026, 01:48189-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:02190no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:07190first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.42%
avg views ÷ 187 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.0
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total96
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1725.8%
1218.2%
💯913.6%
🔥812.1%
🤣57.58%
👌46.06%
👏34.55%
🎉23.03%
🕊23.03%
😁23.03%
💔11.52%
🦄11.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC3 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1👏1💯1🤣1

8 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC4 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Знаете, что оказалось самым сложным бизнес-проектом в моей жизни? Отпуск. 👀Первые три дня я пытался делегировать сон, проверял рабочие чаты каждые 4 секунды и чуть не закрыл сделку с официантом на пляже. ⏺Оказывается, «просто лежать» - это навык. И чтобы освоить его без вреда для нервной системы и печени, пришлось внедрить пару жёстких КПЭ: ⏺Детокс от уведомлений. Телефон переведён в режим «не беспокоить». Если оф

1👍1💯1

1 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC16 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

2👍1😁1

1 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Твоя формула достижения целей. Смысл → Пространство → Регулярность → Диалог → Фиксация → Доверие -Смысл (зачем мне это сейчас?) ⏺Цель у тебя начинает работать только если она прожита. Пока смысл не ясен телом, цель буксует. -Пространство (контейнер) ⏺Ты достигаешь целей не в одиночном спринте, а когда есть свидетели процесса. Цель становится реальной, когда у неё есть дом. -Регулярность вместо рывка ⏺Твоя сила

1👍1💯1

29 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сделай свой день. Тонкая работа. ⏰ Встань пораньше. Ну, то есть по будильнику, который ты поставил на 6:00, а потом перенёс на 6:15, потом на 7:00, а потом... ладно, неважно. 💪 Зато когда ты наконец встал, ты немедленно взялся за дело. Полчаса листал ленту, «чтобы войти в ритм». Психологическая настройка, это тонкая работа. ☕️ Потом кофе. Первая чашка - обязательная. Вторая - для вдохновения. Третья - уже просто т

2👍1🤣1

27 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему ты ходишь кругами по квартире, но не можешь заставить себя работать? Ты не устал, ты не ленивый. Ты просто жертва одного психологического механизма и он буквально управляет твоей жизнью. ⏺Умные часы дали тебе то, чего не хватает в работе: чёткую цифру, мгновенную обратную связь и ощущение прогресса в реальном времени. 8 432 шага из 10 000 - мозг видит незавершённость и требует закрыть гештальт. Ты встаёшь и

👍1💯1

26 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC12 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1👍1👏1🤣1

24 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уязвимость лидера как источник доверия. Почему сильные руководители не боятся быть настоящими? ⏺В современном бизнесе фасад больше не работает. Он рождает не уважение, а дистанцию и напряжение. ⏺Искренность формирует доверие. Когда лидер способен честно сказать: «Я сейчас не знаю ответа, давайте подумаем вместе». Это снимает с сотрудников страх ошибиться и открывает путь к честному диалогу. ⏺Настоящие эмоции объе

👌1👍1🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему одни сотрудники горят работой, а другие просто отрабатывают часы? 💯Дело не только в зарплате, бонусах или комфортном офисе. Всё чаще исследования и практика показывают: главный источник устойчивой мотивации - это смысл, который человек видит в своей работе. ⏺Когда сотрудник понимает, зачем он делает свою работу и какой вклад вносит в общий результат, меняется не только его отношение к задачам. -Повышается в

👍1💯1🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC16 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как сохранять доверие и человечность в мире ускорения? ✨Мы живем в эпоху, где скорость стала ключевым показателем эффективности. Искусственный интеллект, автоматизация, постоянный поток информации - все это позволяет принимать решения быстрее, производить больше и масштабироваться эффективнее. ⏺Но есть один ресурс, который не подчиняется законам ускорения, это доверие. Доверие формируется не за счет скорости, а за

1👍1🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 05:30 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👌1💯1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @center_sphere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 617,063 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Центр СФЕРА” (@center_sphere), 187 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/center_sphere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.