Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐂𝗲ᥣ𝗶𝕟ᥲ💘@⍴𝗶ᥲɾ_ᥲ𝕘ꫀɳ𝘁

@celina_staff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002325088731
TypeChannel
Username@celina_staff
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/celina_staff

Growth

6913 Aug 2026, 00:47 — 69 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 06:37 — 69 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 00:4713 Aug 2026, 06:37
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:3769no change
13 Aug 2026, 00:4769first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 4 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5267470023504462821616.7%
custom 5265168835861844841411.1%
custom 5267500595081674664411.1%
custom 526501786776139580038.33%
custom 531663393002621904938.33%
custom 526480943299851475325.56%
custom 526510502123776210425.56%
custom 538878945361346473425.56%
custom 539092745397367736825.56%
custom 539108045788863012525.56%
custom 539114393321029786225.56%
custom 526492088739984805112.78%
custom 526518027335975396812.78%
custom 531670075112740747012.78%
custom 538873954179852312812.78%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @celina_staff. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 March 2026 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2026, 10:12 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🐥 огромное спасибо за звездочку 😍😍

custom 52674700235044628211

22 Jun 2026, 12:27 UTC20 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @kriksi_portPhoto

▸ rec͛ruitment for or͛d͓ers; 🍋 FREE ⟨ анкета ⟩ ⟨ правила ⟩ 𝓷𝓮𝔀 обязательно к прочтению I⃨"l⃨l⃨ m⃨a⃨k⃨e⃨ i⃨t⃨ 𝗟𝗘𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗗𝗘 2/𝟑 order's͓. wr͛ite: @kriksiport_bot . репост э͟͟т͟͟о͟͟г͟͟о͟͟ поста себе на канал

20 Jun 2026, 20:31 UTC25 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎀🥹🤩⍴ꪮдв𝗎жꫀн𝗎е ❕🎀 • ➿ ➖• ➿ 🎀 ➿ •➖ ➿ • (( 👜 ) 𝐂𝗲лυн — я ɞзял𐐼 на п⍴ꪮдв𝗎жꫀн𝗎е п⍴ꫀкраɕнყю жყ⍴н𐐼л𝗎сткყ М𝗎⍴э !! 🎀 ✈️🎀@celina_staff 👜 & ✈️🎀@MireJour🎀🎀

custom 52674700235044628212custom 52650178677613958001custom 52675005950816746641

19 Jun 2026, 17:41 UTC282 views18 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎀 𝐂𝗲ᥣ𝗶𝕟ᥲ . 👜 @⍴𝗶ᥲɾ_ᥲ𝕘ꫀɳ𝘁 🍬 • ➿ ➖• ➿ 🎀 ➿ •➖ ➿ • (( 👜 ) 𝐂𝗲лυн – я пи𐐼р агꫀнт ! м𑄜й п⍴от𑄜т𝗎п Юндж𝗎н из Лꫀ Се⍴𐐼фиო . пр𑄜ч𝗎тать под⍴обнꫀꫀ ო𑄜жно ɞ 𝗎нфо !! 🎀 ➖ 🎀🤩нф𑄜 & 🤩⍴𝕒йɕ 🎀 🥹🤩н𝐤ꫀты 👜 🤩𑄜т🎀 🔳👜** It's tiოe to s𐐼y 🎀 g𑄜𑄜dbყe,,🎀두려움이 없던 나에게 . . 🎀@celina_staff 👜 #agent 🎀

custom 52651688358618448414custom 52674700235044628213custom 52675005950816746643custom 52648094329985147532custom 52650178677613958002custom 52651050212377621042custom 52649208873998480511custom 52651802733597539681

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @celina_staff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 885,906 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐂𝗲ᥣ𝗶𝕟ᥲ💘@⍴𝗶ᥲɾ_ᥲ𝕘ꫀɳ𝘁” (@celina_staff), 69 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/celina_staff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.