Channel
@cecpital_gains
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
487subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002008777288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cecpital_gains |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cecpital_gains |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 487 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 490 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 492 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 493 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 493 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cecpital_gains. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Same with sol feel like 105 is very strong resistance but sooner than later we are going to test it. Until then it'll be in this accumulation zone. As long as btc holds we shouldn't go below 59
❤1
Signed cec
Haven't really been posting about charts but nothing really has changed too much we are close to bottom than we were last time. A drop down to the mid 60,000s is completely standard market structure, holding just above the strongest historical technical bounce zone. Idk if we get that 46k anymore I'm not 💯 on that. But other than that Q4 looks bullish.
❤1
Signed cec
Video, posted without a caption
🔥1
Signed cec
Now we test the 79 zone resistance, like I mentioned previously sol looks good again.
Signed cec
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed cec
runnr.trade/@cec Get on runnr if you haven't already niche alpha over there if you like trenching. Sign up using my link to get a 10% off fee. I know the team they are some hardworking people and have a solid community if you like memecoin you should pay attention.
😭1
Signed cec
We did exactly what I thought would happen, we are soon getting in the best entry zones for spots if not already. Expecting a lot of side ways movement in Q3 and start of green in Q4. 52k and 46k generational entries imo. If we continue on our 4 years cycle trend.
Signed cec
I've seen a lot of kols talk about $sol and surprisingly I kinda agree with them. Sol did bottom imo and if that btc 59k was bottom too this is easy buy. Will it be up only from here probably NO but will you buy the exact bottom NO! I'll start to build a position again idk might take a few months but I think the worst is almost over. Anything from 60-80 range is good as long as btc doesn't shit itself ago to like 45k…
Signed cec
We did almost hit 58k and had our quick bounce mostly bc of spcx bringing in some liquidity most likely we continue a little bit more and go down again before consolidating around these ranges, bottom is getting closer and closer everyday imo. Enjoy your weekend 🤝
Signed cec
Video, posted without a caption
Signed cec
https://x.com/i/status/2062772955629953195
❤1
Signed cec
Ye so
Signed cec
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cecpital_gains. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cecpital gains” (@cecpital_gains), 487 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cecpital_gains.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.