空了哥哥们💋

Channel
沐沐抓龙筋
@cczlj520025
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003306999022 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cczlj520025 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cczlj520025 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 88 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 79 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 87.3%
- avg views ÷ 88 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 76.9
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (13 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 538 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
【万人选妃电报小程序】 ✅狼友避雷请到万人选妃✅ 万人选妃电报小程序是 小圈. 中圈. 大圈. 洋酒. 综合平台满足所有狼友的需求… 平台老师👉必须拍验证视频上榜 👇上海万人选妃修车群✅ https://t.me/wanrenq 👇上海小洋酒总群✅ https://t.me/shzhenr99 👇上海万人选妃小程序✅ https://t.me/JMZLBOT/abcd 免费上榜 @mhan521 双向机器人 @wanrgbot
🎉 自助上榜资料提交成功,将在 24小时 内审核~ - 请先复制 下面的链接 或 直接分享此消息 到您的开课频道(❗️必须❗️) https://t.me/zhaocha_bot 导航 | 总榜 | 推荐榜 | 🧧现金福利群
🎉 浦东【沐沐 @cccc520025】A套餐半价 🎁 奖品清单 • 300A套餐优惠劵 × 2 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 上海修车协会 • 加入 沐沐抓龙筋 • 加入 TG中文导航搜索 • 需消耗修车币:10 • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗:188修车币 • 祝福上限:无上限次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率 ⌛ 抽选时刻 • 2026-08-17 13:30:00 📜 抽奖说明 中奖不出击的别参加,刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、撤回内容等,一律视为无效发言,不计入统计! 再次重申:灌水无意义发言都不兑奖!请用心交流。 活动最终解释权归上海修车协会管理团队所有。 中奖的联系 老师 约时间 工兵优惠出击必须写报告 24小时内预约时间,三天内出击,过时自动作废 炸号需找管理验证,无法验证,奖品放回奖池重新抽奖 中奖需本人出击不得转让 中将联系:@cccc520025 ✨ 愿命运之…
📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 🥰 花名: #沐沐 ✅ 状态:🟢 已验证 /【视频验证】 📍 地区位置:#浦东 🏠 场地:小区 ⬆️ 身高:166cm ⚖️ 体重:50gk 🎂 年龄:26 👙 罩杯:B 💰 价格:600/A 800/B 1100/C 1599/D【抓龙筋套餐】 夜 : 🔡时长: 🎯 服务标签:抓龙筋 🔡 个人介绍: @cccc520025 双向:@mumudejiqibot 频道: https://t.me/cczlj520025 (老师简介) 老师抓龙筋嘎嘎猛。 我在上海修车协会上榜了
Channel name was changed to «沐沐抓龙筋»
沐沐抓龙筋 pinned a photo
🎰 上海市民网 浦东 沐沐 优惠福利 @cccc520025 📮 参与条件 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-沐沐的频道 🎫 加入-上海市民网 └ 🔑 发送口令﹝欢迎沐沐入驻上海市民网﹞ 🎫 加入-TG中文导航搜索 🎁 奖品名单 💰️ P工兵卷(A套餐) × 1 📜 抽奖说明 1、无上课意向的兄弟,请勿抽奖。 2、中奖24小时内联系老师兑换,逾期作废。(按鸽子处理) 3、3天内需按时上课、提交作业。如有特殊情况,提前报备。 4、凡无故缺席、未提交作业,未报备、将取消后续资格。 5、优惠券禁止私下转让或买卖(工兵卷要写报告,报告不能重复发几个群) 6、中奖联系:@Zi_603 📆 开奖时间 • 北京时间 2026-08-15 12:27
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @cczlj520025. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 590,164 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“沐沐抓龙筋” (@cczlj520025), 88 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cczlj520025.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.