Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝕔𝕔𝕚𝕣𝕣𝕔𝕦𝕤𝕤ᵉᵇˡ

@ccirrcuss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003650433770
TypeChannel
Username@ccirrcuss
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 30 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ccirrcuss

Growth

1787 Aug 2026, 16:28 — 178 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:17 — 178 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:288 Aug 2026, 13:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:17178no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:28178first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
110.6%
avg views ÷ 178 subscribers
Avg views / post
197
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (30 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total984
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

712 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529632466177100107327939.2%
custom 51907833695494747478511.9%
custom 53820620101145360997210.1%
custom 5429103665921148544486.74%
🕊446.18%
375.20%
custom 5382132387448646704334.63%
😨314.35%
🥰162.25%
custom 5397878961621456590141.97%
custom 5415669583744892595131.83%
💋101.40%
🆒91.26%
🤬91.26%
🦄91.26%
🍓20.281%
custom 542920175438425581810.14%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 712reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
153
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 17 we hold a reading for · 59%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ccirrcuss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/BaykidedaTOCHKaRU Новый тгк деда заходите

custom 52963246617710010732

8 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC45 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ловите, пишите, че как вам, завтра будет новая зарисовка, если наберете 100 рк

8 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC49 views28 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

『 НА КРАЮ ГОРОДА 』 ⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣ ➤ tw: целовашки обнимашки ⇣⇣⇣⇣⇣ https://telegra.ph/na-krayu-goroda-08-08 ────── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ────── #мини зарисовка #камазы . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹

custom 542910366592114854411🕊8custom 52963246617710010737custom 53820620101145360991custom 53978789616214565901

3 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC188 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После 8 буду стараться вам через день зарисовки ебашить

custom 529632466177100107311

17 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC687 views86 reactions19 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

『 ПРАВИЛО ТИШИНЫ 』 ⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣ ➤ tw: секс ⇣⇣⇣⇣⇣ https://telegra.ph/pravilo-tishiny-07-17 ────── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ────── #мини зарисовка #камазенцовы . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹

custom 529632466177100107349custom 519078336954947474718custom 538206201011453609918🥰1

13 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC646 views59 reactions16 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

『 ВНИЗ 』 ⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣ ➤ tw: неприятные сцены ➤ часть 2/2 ⇣⇣⇣⇣⇣ https://telegra.ph/vniz-07-13 ────── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ────── #мини зарисовка #камазы . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹

custom 542910366592114854431custom 529632466177100107312custom 51907833695494747479custom 53820620101145360992custom 53821323874486467042custom 54156695837448925952custom 53978789616214565901

12 Jul 2026, 20:07 UTC504 views62 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

『 ВНИЗ 』 ⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣ ➤ tw: неприятные сцены ➤ часть 1/2 ⇣⇣⇣⇣⇣ https://telegra.ph/vniz-07-12 ────── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ────── #мини зарисовка #камазы . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹

custom 529632466177100107332custom 53978789616214565909🕊8🦄6custom 53820620101145360995custom 51907833695494747472

28 Jun 2026, 19:26 UTC811 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Sexxxparty666Photo

🤩🤩💫💫💫💫💫💫💫🤩 ⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩🤩⭐️⭐️ 🪦@Sexxxparty666 and 🤩@ccirrcuss 🤩🤩🤩ихий скандал 🐩 🤩читать брак кашенцовых

custom 529632466177100107320custom 53821323874486467043🕊2custom 53978789616214565902

23 Jun 2026, 20:21 UTC926 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сука, блять, пиздец, иди нахуй, уебище, нахуй тебя мать рожала, я её выебала раз пять, потом по кругу её пустили, и из её пизды вылезло такое отродье в виде тебя, вся в отца ты пошла, я гляжу

🕊12custom 52963246617710010735

21 Jun 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,070 views71 reactions54 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

« ШАШЛЫКИ » ⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣ https://telegra.ph/shashlyki-06-21 ────── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ────── ➤ tw: неприятные сцены, кровяка, смерти #мини зарисовка #лиданцовы . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹

custom 538206201011453609939custom 529632466177100107315custom 538213238744864670415🕊2

10 Jun 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,430 views80 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

collab with: @N1I2L3S » В ГРИМЕРКЕ « ⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣⌣ https://telegra.ph/V-grimerke-06-10 ───── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── ➤ tw: с е к с . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ ⊹.

custom 529632466177100107348custom 519078336954947474716custom 538213238744864670413🕊1🥰1custom 54291036659211485441

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ccirrcuss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 949,304 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕔𝕔𝕚𝕣𝕣𝕔𝕦𝕤𝕤ᵉᵇˡ” (@ccirrcuss), 178 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ccirrcuss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.