Channel
@cccaeles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
243subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002169459709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cccaeles |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 29 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cccaeles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 243 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 243 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,670 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5312403434484287264 | 677 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5425111519589325094 | 662 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5316503345840540612 | 394 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5339536336325984979 | 372 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5379551721989104279 | 319 | 8.69% | |
| custom 5334890873928822665 | 259 | 7.06% | |
| custom 5408911379690172558 | 212 | 5.78% | |
| custom 5422398186884971427 | 208 | 5.67% | |
| custom 5404375726721873417 | 200 | 5.45% | |
| custom 5332648849460711316 | 145 | 3.95% | |
| custom 5381977742856189643 | 100 | 2.72% | |
| custom 5463003305917554781 | 55 | 1.50% | |
| custom 5323270874269239906 | 24 | 0.654% | |
| custom 5339042578295703827 | 17 | 0.463% | |
| custom 5303046465977854879 | 9 | 0.245% | |
| custom 5321087321485883177 | 7 | 0.191% | |
| custom 5328163434724864567 | 5 | 0.136% | |
| custom 5422538997387767091 | 5 | 0.136% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,670reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2024 to 18 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟>// au w¡th heeseung . « бутоньерка » в этом неправильном уравнении двух сердец возникло лишь одно истинное решение – выживут только любовники. > pt1. > pt2. > pt3. > pt4. —— pt5. буду рада вашему отклику! приятного прочтения!🌟💬
custom 5379551721989104279175custom 538197774285618964350custom 542511151958932509446
у меня этой прекрасной женщине посвящен тред
custom 538197774285618964312custom 53795517219891042794
🌟>// au w¡th heeseung . « бутоньерка » в этом неправильном уравнении двух сердец возникло лишь одно истинное решение – выживут только любовники. > pt1. > pt2. > pt3. —— pt4. буду рада вашему отклику! приятного прочтения!🌟💬
custom 5379551721989104279140custom 542511151958932509439custom 538197774285618964337
а чтобы перечитать не только здешнее творчество, переходите сюда. раньше не допускала мысль о том, что здесь есть те, кто не знаком с моим старым творчеством, поэтому милости прошу🤍
custom 542511151958932509429custom 53124034344842872647custom 53165033458405406126
база.
custom 542511151958932509454custom 531240343448428726418custom 531650334584054061218custom 53819777428561896431
🌟>// au w¡th heeseung . « бутоньерка » в этом неправильном уравнении двух сердец возникло лишь одно истинное решение – выживут только любовники. > pt1. > pt2. —— pt3. буду рада вашему отклику! приятного прочтения!🌟💬
custom 5312403434484287264152custom 542511151958932509445custom 531650334584054061240
🌟>// au w¡th heeseung . « бутоньерка » в этом неправильном уравнении двух сердец возникло лишь одно истинное решение – выживут только любовники. > pt1. —— pt2. буду рада вашему отклику! приятного прочтения!🌟💬
custom 5312403434484287264151custom 542511151958932509446custom 531650334584054061239
🌟>// au w¡th heeseung . « бутоньерка » в этом неправильном уравнении двух сердец возникло лишь одно истинное решение – выживут только любовники. —— pt1. буду рада вашему отклику! приятного прочтения!🌟💬
custom 5425111519589325094162custom 531650334584054061246custom 531240343448428726444
🌟>// au w¡th sunghoon . « сирагику » ему было дано ровно девять жизней, но возможность воссоединиться появилась лишь в десятой. > pt1. > pt2. > pt3. > pt4. > pt5. > pt6. > pt7. > pt8. > pt9. —— final. буду рада вашему отклику! приятного прочтения!🌟💬
custom 5312403434484287264152custom 531650334584054061239custom 542511151958932509437
🌟>// au w¡th sunghoon . « сирагику » ему было дано ровно девять жизней, но возможность воссоединиться появилась лишь в десятой. > pt1. > pt2. > pt3. > pt4. > pt5. > pt6. > pt7. > pt8. —— pt9. буду рада вашему отклику! приятного прочтения!🌟💬
custom 5425111519589325094165custom 531650334584054061245custom 531240343448428726443
🌟>// au w¡th sunghoon . « сирагику » ему было дано ровно девять жизней, но возможность воссоединиться появилась лишь в десятой. > pt1. > pt2. > pt3. > pt4. > pt5. > pt6. > pt7. —— pt8. буду рада вашему отклику! приятного прочтения!🌟💬
custom 5316503345840540612161custom 531240343448428726444custom 542511151958932509439
мои мужья
custom 531240343448428726459custom 532327087426923990614custom 540437572672187341713custom 54630033059175547816custom 54223981868849714274custom 53326488494607113161custom 53395363363259849791
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cccaeles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 303,642 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cccaeles named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“!¡ caeles’” (@cccaeles), 243 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cccaeles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.