Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

611.001.

@cc611001

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

156subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002720091714
TypeChannel
Username@cc611001
DescriptionЗа покупкой: @w2w663 @eheehc личные тгк: @tr4gedy611 @nov001sosa
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cc611001

Growth

1567 Aug 2026, 17:49 — 156 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:30 — 156 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:498 Aug 2026, 18:30
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 155–157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:30156no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:49156first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
130
Links
114

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53844957275629896082359.0%
custom 53932678460777515701641.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Feb 2026, 20:38 UTC358 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#available КУПИТЬ

custom 53844957275629896081

11 Feb 2026, 20:21 UTC285 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#available КУПИТЬ

custom 53932678460777515701

9 Feb 2026, 08:55 UTCviews —

611.001. pinned «!!!!!!!! за покупкой на все обложки писать @w2w663»

9 Feb 2026, 08:51 UTC276 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

!!!!!!!! за покупкой на все обложки писать @w2w663

custom 53932678460777515701

25 Jan 2026, 23:56 UTC363 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#available КУПИТЬ

custom 53844957275629896085custom 53932678460777515701

18 Jan 2026, 00:02 UTC395 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#available КУПИТЬ

custom 53844957275629896083custom 53932678460777515701

16 Jan 2026, 12:37 UTC338 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#available КУПИТЬ

custom 53844957275629896085custom 53932678460777515703

4 Jan 2026, 08:02 UTC452 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#available КУПИТЬ

custom 53844957275629896085custom 53932678460777515702

29 Dec 2025, 16:55 UTC403 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#available КУПИТЬ

custom 53844957275629896082custom 53932678460777515701

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cc611001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 939,663 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“611.001.” (@cc611001), 156 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cc611001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.