Channel
@cawanski
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
379subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002129414036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cawanski |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cawanski |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 379 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 379 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (9 January 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 448 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
827 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5235686393635679301 | 282 | 34.1% | |
| custom 5976305408787091589 | 201 | 24.3% | |
| custom 5976669969906146635 | 183 | 22.1% | |
| custom 5765126569831960391 | 161 | 19.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 827reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cawanski. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 January 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ох, друзья, невероятно, но да ... я открываю комишки.....да еще и сос кидкой на ближайшие пару месяцев🙄 Цены и прочая инфа будет вот тут. https://t.me/prices_cwnsk Все, всем спасибо! пойду дальше умирать от жары🙁
custom 59766699699061466357custom 57651265698319603911
Еще вопрос такой насущный... Кто шарит за экранники по типу айпада, посоветуйте, пожалуйста, модели. Самсунг, эпл, хуавей или как там его, бренд не важен в принципе. Главное, чтоб рисовалось с кайфом. На какие вообще характеристики внимание обращать? Помогите💻 (я вспомнила слово, планшеты, да)
custom 52356863936356793017
Скетчевые портретики🐈 Возможно доработаю кого-то из них и возьму на следующий арт (но это не точно 🙂)
custom 576512656983196039121custom 59766699699061466359custom 59763054087870915895custom 52356863936356793014
«Let the hunter be safe, let him find comfort. And let this dream his captor, foretell a pleasant awakening. Be one day, a fond, distant memory». #bloodborne #the_doll
custom 597666996990614663519custom 523568639363567930114custom 59763054087870915896custom 57651265698319603913
Накалякала его наконец-то.... #bg3
custom 523568639363567930140custom 576512656983196039121custom 597666996990614663519custom 59763054087870915892
«Have no fear, I will hold thee». - Rennala, Queen of the Full Moon #elden_ring
custom 597630540878709158934custom 523568639363567930119custom 576512656983196039115custom 59766699699061466355
Вы чево тут, живы?🤨
custom 523568639363567930116custom 576512656983196039111custom 59763054087870915899custom 59766699699061466352
"Direct thy maledictions, thine ire, and thy grief towards me alone" #elden_ring
custom 597630540878709158932custom 523568639363567930120custom 576512656983196039118custom 59766699699061466352
Новости о ТГ не радужные, но знайте, я буду бороться за канал до последнего.💪 Если он совсем помрёт, ищите меня в Tumblr. Пока это моя единственная активная платформа после тг..
custom 523568639363567930121custom 576512656983196039111custom 59766699699061466357
💥 ура картинка
custom 523568639363567930151custom 597630540878709158921custom 597666996990614663517custom 57651265698319603912
Скечтчи из щп🥺
custom 576512656983196039134custom 523568639363567930119custom 597666996990614663513custom 59763054087870915893
Ура, с праздником, блудный автор вернулся🥺 P. s. спасибо за звезды!! и за репосты низкий вам поклон
custom 597630540878709158936custom 597666996990614663521custom 523568639363567930113custom 57651265698319603912
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @cawanski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,050,930 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴄᴀᴡᴀɴsᴋɪ” (@cawanski), 379 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cawanski.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.