🎉 Giveaway Finished! 🎉 Winners received the following gifts: 1. Jester Hat #17849 - Telegram Link (Internal Transfer)
Signed Tonnel Relayer Bot

Channel
@caviarsquad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001919619201 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caviarsquad |
| Description | По всем вопросам: @simaway Детальная информация по mini-apps в закрепах сообщества, где с большой вероятностью каждое из этих приложений принесет криптовалюту на блокчейне TON, который сейчас активно внедряется в Телеграм. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caviarsquad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 79 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 79 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5215218645382211332 | 8 | 50.0% | |
| custom 5091852504442864603 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5469916931953796627 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5355102083785694505 | 2 | 12.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2024 to 23 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 Giveaway Finished! 🎉 Winners received the following gifts: 1. Jester Hat #17849 - Telegram Link (Internal Transfer)
Signed Tonnel Relayer Bot
Apple официально сняла ограничения на криптовалютные транзакции в iOS: разрешены прямые оплаты в Bitcoin, других криптовалютах и покупка NFT внутри приложений. Более того, отменяется «налог Apple» в 30% на такие покупки — теперь криптоприложения могут принимать оплату напрямую, без комиссии в пользу платформы.
На данный момент Telegram интегрировал только NFT-подарки - и всё, на этом нововведения закончились. Но есть шанс, что в мае-июне что-то сдвинется, и поспособствовать этому может недавняя новость Epic Games недавно выиграла суд у Apple по теме внутриигровых платежей. Это может открыть дорогу новым фишкам в Telegram, в том числе более свободной работе с криптой и цифровыми активами, так как непридется выплачивать моно…
Хотели мы этого, или нет, но 8 марта — день неизбежный! Поэтому Телеграм на пару с TON Found приготовили для всех девушек нечто уникальное — NFT-подарки(цифровые активы), один из них в виде денежного букета! 💐 Может, это и недорого, но зато с сердцем🙂! Поздравляйте близких и коллег, дарите этот оригинальный и технологичный подарок — и пусть в этот день всем будет не только приятно, но и выгодно! 😉 С 8 марта! ❤️🔥 …
Signed Max Soloviov
Так как этот канал был создан для поддержки экосистемы и майнинга вокруг блокчейна 🤑TON, стоит отметить, что ситуация с токенами на TON не отличается от других блокчейнов: после листинга большинство активов падает в цене. Основная причина этого — отсутствие утилитарности и реальных механизмов использования токенов. Первыми крупными проектами на TON стали NOT и DOGS – они раздавали криптовалюту абсолютно бесплатно, б…
Signed Max Soloviov
Заходите и проверяйте кто сколько получил. Рекомендую выводить на биржу 😏
Signed Max Soloviov
Стоимость токена в цене либо просядет, или же обретет повышенную стоимость. Цена будет зависить от стоимости ваучера на getgems. 👍
custom 52152186453822113324
Signed Max Soloviov
👏 Подарки в Telegram // Совсем скоро в Telegram появятся «Подарки». Команда мессенджера активно работает над новой функцией, она может измениться на релизе. На текущий момент подарки представлены в виде различных стикеров с разной стоимостью. Валютой для них являются «Telegram звёзды». Все подарки делятся на общие и лимитированные — ограниченные общим количеством на платформе. Например, всего 1000 штук на весь Tel…
custom 50918525044428646031custom 52152186453822113321
Signed Max Soloviov
Аналог Dogs, только история про котов, с верификацией в телеграмме и большой аудиторией. Заходите во вкладку Home, и ищите Show more tasks - выполняете. Майнинг заканчивается 30 числа, листинг в октябре. Также ежедневно во вкладке Avatar, можно отправлять фотографии котов и получать доп. токены. Ранее я уже приглашал в это приложение. Ссылка на котов: https://t.me/catsgang_bot/join?startapp=npclIbBMJYtQrFk-9Labh
custom 50918525044428646031
Signed Max Soloviov
🤣
custom 50918525044428646031
Signed Max Soloviov
Лайфхак: на что можно потратить дроп токенов $HMSTR
custom 52152186453822113321
Signed Max Soloviov
Залоченные токены, круто, спасибо разработчикам 🕺 Также можно сразу отметить, что ключи все таки играли значимую роль на объем эйрдропа, потому что за 225 ключей, мне начислили - 600 токенов. 🤣
Signed Max Soloviov
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @caviarsquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,085,657 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Caviar Squad | Sima Live” (@caviarsquad), 79 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caviarsquad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.