Channel
@cathyfivev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
157subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002192829816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cathyfivev |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cathyfivev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:09 | 157 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 158 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 158 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
477 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 18.7% | |
| custom 5276350426734684225 | 78 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5289657730066312700 | 61 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5361552231311094080 | 55 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5463237690872834162 | 53 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5830035560172884856 | 46 | 9.64% | |
| 💘 | 41 | 8.60% | |
| custom 5386426719089465700 | 19 | 3.98% | |
| 🍓 | 15 | 3.14% | |
| 💋 | 13 | 2.73% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 1.05% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.21% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 477reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cathyfivev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 December 2025 to 10 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
— Как хорошо, что это не мы, правда, Мари? — заявляет Изабелла, радостно улыбаясь. И я киваю. Я хочу крикнуть им что-то вроде «Остановитесь!», «Прекратите!» и «Хватит!», но из моего рта вылетает лишь приглушённый шёпот... 🔇🔇г л а в а. Клуб Индивидуалистов. клик! 🦋 #персонамари 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸
custom 583003556017288485615custom 52896577300663127007custom 52763504267346842255custom 54632376908728341621
📝📝📝📝📝📝📝 📝📝📝📝 История о надежде, бренных богах и вечном поиске смысла, которого нет. И, впрочем, никогда не было. О том, кто ищет цель существования. И о той, что цепляется за свою жизнь и личность. Пожалуй, эта история о том, что нужно идти вперёд и жить с высоко поднятой головой несмотря ни на что. Даже если очень трудно и больно, можно найти в себе силы двигаться дальше, ведь мы не знаем, что на самом деле ожидае…
custom 52763504267346842256custom 58300355601728848566custom 53615522313110940802custom 52896577300663127001custom 53864267190894657001
Милые мои, срочный опрос. Кого рисуем из Шарлоттки?
The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 53615522313110940806❤3🍓3custom 58300355601728848561
VÆDES 🪷 pinned a photo
👎 Куда я пропала? Итак, я пропала, да. Мне нет прощения, солнышки. Но в своё оправдание скажу, что этот учебный год был ну очень тяжёлым, и я дотягивала его на последнем издыхании. Были даже мысли о том, чтобы забросить канал и начать всё с чистого листа, но я слишком люблю вас, милые. Я и сейчас уставшая, но рисовать и развиваться надо, так что я возвращаюсь. 💐 В целом, конечно, я буду появляться реже, чем в эпоху…
custom 527635042673468422515custom 53615522313110940804custom 54632376908728341623custom 52896577300663127002
🌸: Я! Живая! Ура! Ну, я говорила о том, что до лета буду сильно занята... ВПРы, проект, аттестационные, видите ли... Впрочем, это не мешает мне иногда рисовать для вас в традишке. С диджиталом, конечно, пока что напряжёнка, но надеюсь, что вы меня поймёте и примете, солнышки. По просьбам трудящихся... Йорозу! Да, у меня попросили её в предложке, и я просто не могла не нарисовать эту красавицу) А ещё есть новость: я н…
custom 527635042673468422511❤6custom 52896577300663127006💘2custom 53615522313110940802custom 53864267190894657002custom 58300355601728848561
🌸: Ну всё, новый фандом это надолго. 👁️ VK 🤍 Pinterest 🤩 #ютаоккоцу 🌟 #магическаябитва ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰
custom 528965773006631270014custom 53615522313110940809custom 54632376908728341627❤1💘1custom 53864267190894657001custom 58300355601728848561
🌸: Солнышки, я живая, я не умерла, я тута. Я просто зашаривала за новый фандом... Прошу прощения за то, что исчезла, не предупредив. Вероятно, это не будет редкостью до конца учебного года, так как много всего навалилось, да и блокировки делают своё дело. Если вдруг телега начнёт штормить, мы переезжаем в пинтерест. P.S.: В максе не получится, там только приватные каналы. Вот такие пироги. P.P.S.: Меня же не отменя…
custom 528965773006631270012custom 52763504267346842257custom 54632376908728341626custom 53615522313110940803❤2🍓1custom 53864267190894657001custom 58300355601728848561
Channel name was changed to «VÆDES 🪷»
🌺: А вот и я! Не ждали?) Солнышки, в связи с замедлением телеграмма, теперь буду публиковаться и в других мессенджерах. ☂ VK 🕯 Pinterest 🌸 Max 🤩 #скарлетелла 🤩 #homicipher 💪🤩💪💪🌹💪💪🤩💪💪🌹💪
custom 546323769087283416211custom 52896577300663127006custom 53615522313110940804❤2custom 58300355601728848562🍓1custom 52763504267346842251
🌺: Напоминаю, я всё ещё в ресте, но скорее всего через недельку-две вернусь, как улажу все свои дела. 🌑
❤10custom 58300355601728848566custom 52763504267346842253custom 52896577300663127003custom 54632376908728341623💘1
🌺: Огромное спасибо, красота получилась!
custom 53864267190894657009custom 52896577300663127004custom 54632376908728341623custom 53615522313110940802🍓1💘1custom 52763504267346842251
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cathyfivev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Милые мои, срочный опрос. Кого рисуем из Шарлоттки?
The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 10 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 748,600 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VÆDES 🪷” (@cathyfivev), 157 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cathyfivev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.