Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for вэлд как та пустота в категоричности мнений.

Channel

вэлд как та пустота в категоричности мнений.

@categoricalopinions

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002781412147
TypeChannel
Username@categoricalopinions
Descriptionместоимения она/ее. внезапно оно овладело мной, и свобода обернулась иллюзией. я был вынужден наблюдать. узник собственного разума.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/categoricalopinions

Growth

379 August 2026 — 37 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37 subscribers9 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:0237no change
9 Aug 2026, 09:4637first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 25 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
514.9%
avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
Avg views / post
191
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held9 (25 March 202620 July 2026)
Views total381
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
74
Videos
21
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54475931436481413934022.1%
custom 52672846441260218913720.4%
custom 52832202312195870473217.7%
custom 51885559050204946412916.0%
custom 5231371373137374995168.84%
126.63%
custom 526496044834360732163.31%
👻42.21%
custom 526712474678856381031.66%
🕊21.10%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @categoricalopinions. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC35 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

в основном косплеи делаю редко, но очень метко :p рональд покупался аж более полугода назад и только сейчас сумела привести его +- в порядок.

custom 51885559050204946419custom 52832202312195870477custom 523137137313737499541custom 52671247467885638101custom 52672846441260218911custom 54475931436481413931

19 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC346 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⠀ 🌨️ 🌟 🌨️ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ⠀ ☦ ☦ ☦ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 🌨️ 🌟 🌨️ ⠀ ⠀ — игра была настолько великолепна, что окружающие оказались словно под гипнозом. хороша ли она по факту? я не знаю. весь мир в любом случае оказался под началом моим. ⠀ • ph/edit

custom 544759314364814139311custom 526728464412602189172👻2🕊2custom 52832202312195870472

6 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC404 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

happy b-day to me..? ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ hewwo, сегодня мне исполняется 20 лет, ого. для меня это достаточно важная дата, плюсом для меня это знак как сильно я выросла в скилле в косплей-деятельности. самое приятное для творческого человека — репост работ и поздравления. буду максимально им рада. 🌟

custom 518855590502049464111custom 52832202312195870476custom 544759314364814139361custom 52671247467885638101custom 52672846441260218911

26 May 2026, 17:44 UTC111 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 51885559050204946413custom 52832202312195870473custom 52672846441260218912

26 May 2026, 17:44 UTC83 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @pizdec061Photo

🤩 🤩 🤩 🤩 🤩 🤩 🤩 🤩 типо заставляю вас понимать #art #арт #скетч #myoc

custom 52672846441260218915custom 51885559050204946414custom 54475931436481413933

19 May 2026, 14:20 UTC457 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

так-то у меня очень и очень много контента снято, начиная примерно с октября месяца прошлого года, поэтому постепенно буду все выкладывать. пока покажу вам недавнего эрнандо 🚬

custom 528322023121958704711custom 52313713731373749957custom 526728464412602189152custom 54475931436481413932custom 51885559050204946411

7 May 2026, 11:24 UTC122 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

появилось неожиданное желание поснимать что-то в духе модерн-ау майка, лишь бы канал не пустовал

custom 52672846441260218914custom 52832202312195870472custom 544759314364814139321👻1

7 May 2026, 11:24 UTC116 views19 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

hewwoo! 🎀

custom 54475931436481413938custom 523137137313737499554👻1custom 52672846441260218911

25 Mar 2026, 12:17 UTC151 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

искренне не знаю что выкладывать в последнее время..! по различным мероприятиям и фотосам не бегаю, в надежде, что все-же куда-то выйдет выбраться скоро а пока держите сегодняшнего Итакву

custom 526728464412602189111custom 54475931436481413937custom 526496044834360732161custom 51885559050204946411custom 52671247467885638101custom 52832202312195870471

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @categoricalopinions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 188,025 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“вэлд как та пустота в категоричности мнений.” (@categoricalopinions), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/categoricalopinions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.