Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

~ ᴩиᴄуночᴋи ᴋᴇᴛᴧи ~

@catLi_toca_box

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

175subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002224147019
TypeChannel
Username@catLi_toca_box
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/catLi_toca_box

Growth

175176175.57 August 2026 — 176 subscribers8 August 2026 — 176 subscribers15 August 2026 — 175 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:38175-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:47176no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:40176first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 175 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.5
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (31 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,244
Reactions total168
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓5834.5%
3621.4%
custom 54115228142954246961911.3%
custom 52558680154628811151710.1%
custom 5246800480507542323127.14%
💘127.14%
custom 545207294486174162784.76%
❤‍🔥52.98%
💯10.595%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @catLi_toca_box. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC12 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рисую модельку (сейчас это выглядит странно, потом будет норм)😁

custom 52468004805075423231

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

7 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC47 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ловите скетч по animal hospital, я зашарила, теперь шипперю этих котечков🥺🥺 Мы играли вчера вечером, я подохла, Аня играла одна, а я рисовала в это время, по моему очень мило вышло :3

custom 54115228142954246965🍓2💘2custom 52558680154628811151

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

7 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC50 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5🍓1💯1custom 52468004805075423231

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

6 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC51 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍓6💘3custom 52558680154628811152

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

5 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC60 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Он такой няшка, я не могу😃 Новый выдуманный мужик в гаремчик :3

7🍓3custom 52468004805075423232

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

5 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC59 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Очень редко делаю модельки с нуля, а не по токе, так что уже представляю как много будет косяков на анимации🥺🥺

🍓8custom 54115228142954246963custom 54520729448617416271

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

5 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC62 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

О, число красивое :D

custom 54115228142954246965🍓2custom 52468004805075423231

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

5 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC64 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @birthdaycountbot

До вашего дня рождения осталось 333 дня

🍓43custom 52558680154628811153

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

4 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC72 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мне так нравится, что получается с этой анимацией😁, но, к сожалению, не могу вам показать🥺

🍓53custom 52468004805075423231

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

4 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC76 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☺️Чернобыльские мутанты:

🍓5custom 52468004805075423234custom 52558680154628811151custom 54115228142954246961custom 54520729448617416271

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

3 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC70 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Я всё ещё помню как анимировать :D Почти год этого не делала😳😳

❤‍🔥5🍓32

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

3 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC74 views13 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Доброе утро! Сегодня буду вспоминать свое тёмное прошлое аниматора... Вообще мы сейчас активно ведём подготовку к кое-чему интересному😁 Хотелось бы мне назвать это кое-что возрождением тока туба, но хз насколько это вообще реально, так что просто надеюсь, что это вас развлечет🥺🥺 Ода, я все ещё фд токи, знали? :D

7custom 54520729448617416273custom 52558680154628811152🍓1

Signed ~Липтоза - Кетлишо короче🪐...) #INFP #АБ

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @catLi_toca_box. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 330,019 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“~ ᴩиᴄуночᴋи ᴋᴇᴛᴧи ~” (@catLi_toca_box), 175 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catLi_toca_box.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.