Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for casual

Channel

casual

@casualdotoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

189subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002233913169
TypeChannel
Username@casualdotoo
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/casualdotoo

Growth

188189188.57 August 2026 — 188 subscribers8 August 2026 — 188 subscribers16 August 2026 — 189 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 188–189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:28189+1
8 Aug 2026, 12:04188no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:18188first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2955.8%
🔥1223.1%
custom 524240538034400778259.62%
💯35.77%
custom 519519936472889105123.85%
custom 546292787770190169911.92%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @casualdotoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2025 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,720 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

с момента написания предыдущего поста в этом паблике успели распасться AVULUS, где я проработал 1,5 года, я успел поработать в PlayTime пару квал, ИРЛ тоже много чего произошло сил, времени и вдохновения на то, чтобы постить что-то не было, поэтому постараюсь хоть сейчас что-то выдавать иногда почему же новый пост? потому что меня позвали в REKONIX (второй спектральный аналитик в орге), а завтра начинается EWC, где

4💯1🔥1

22 Dec 2025, 13:22 UTC475 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @spectraldotaPhoto

Я конечно не валв, но в качестве рождественского подарка приготовил нечто особенное https://spectral.gg/rewind/ Dota 2 Rewind — Итоги года для дотеров. В комментариях делитесь своими достижениями и прочими приколами :3 FYI: Если не грузится сайт и вы с территории РФ (и вы тут новенькие) — скорее всего ваш провайдер блокирует spectral.gg или cloudflare (или и то, и то). Делать с этим то же самое, что и с любым дру

2💯1🔥1

14 Sept 2025, 20:23 UTC684 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tavernggPhoto

Falcons реже всех на TI14 собирали Helm of the Dominator — всего 3 раза за 29 матчей 🤯 Вот вам и мета Доминатора 😳

5

14 Sept 2025, 19:41 UTC≈3,670 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

UPD: 3. PVISION 🤡 — 23 matches, 1.7391 avg 🛒 7-8. Tundra Esports 🏞— 21 matches, 1.2857 avg 🛒 5-6. Nigma Galaxy 🌌 — 24 matches, 0.7917 avg 🛒 4. BB Team 💩 — 23 matches, 0.7826 avg 🛒 2. Xtreme Gaming 🪽 — 26 matches, 0.6154 avg 🛒 9-13. Wildcard 😈 — 13 matches, 0.6154 avg 🛒 16. Team Nemesis 😒 — 10 mathes, 0.6 avg 🛒 9-13. Yakutou Brothers 🫂 — 16 matches, 0.5625 avg 🛒 9-13. Team Liquid 🐴 — 16 matches, 0.5625 avg 🛒 7-8. Te

2

14 Sept 2025, 13:15 UTC485 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

стало интересно посмотреть как распределились (до гранд финала) места на инте относительно среднего числа доминаторов в игре от команды команды распределены от большего среднего к меньшему 3. PVISION 🤡 — 23 matches, 1.7391 avg 🛒 7-8. Tundra Esports 🏞— 21 matches, 1.2857 avg 🛒 5-6. Nigma Galaxy 🌌 — 24 matches, 0.7917 avg 🛒 4. BB Team 💩 — 23 matches, 0.7826 avg 🛒 9-13. Wildcard 😈 — 13 matches, 0.6154 avg 🛒 16. Team N

custom 524240538034400778252🔥2

13 Sept 2025, 16:07 UTC≈2,070 views3 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

после первой карты 🐦‍🔥 - 🤡 статистика по доминаторам такая (на скрине) то есть в среднем после начала плейофф 🛒 стали собирать на 0,5648 больше, а длительность матчей уменьшилась на ~минуту стата взята отсюда

1💯1custom 51951993647288910511

10 Sept 2025, 22:42 UTC596 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ну и прогнозы позора тоже пусть тут будут

1

10 Sept 2025, 22:38 UTC≈46,000 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

давно меня не было в уличных гонках про то почему пропадал и в целом про итоги года пост мб сделаю чуть позже, сейчас больше интересно про инт поговорить я был в отпуске и поэтому групповую стадию смотрел одним глазом, но тем не менее конечно тема 🛒 не обошла меня стороной на фоне постов по типу "сегодня 9класс на 4 собрал доминатор", "сегодня тундра купили 4 доминатора" и подобного захотелось посмотреть зависимост

5custom 51951993647288910511

22 May 2025, 22:10 UTC757 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

не так быстро, как я думал, но вышел https://www.dota2.com/patches/7.39

1

30 Apr 2025, 17:33 UTC527 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

забавная ситуация, конечно по сути проблема решается хотфиксом уязвимости и скорейшим выходом нового патча, но прецедент интересный. хорошо, что это не произошло во время рияда/инта, тогда бы это все конечно имело другую силу и последствия, а так по сути это может повлиять только на ближайшие турниры, если валв быстро не выпустят новый 7.39 патч (а вероятность выхода патча в ближайшее время думаю возросла сильно, та

1🔥1

30 Apr 2025, 17:33 UTC714 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tavernggPhoto

❗️Уязвимость Доты открыла доступ ко ВСЕМ матчам про-игроков - даже кв-шкам. В интернете появился сайт (название и детали "Таверна" не публикует по этическим соображениям), на котором можно получить детальную информацию о матчах отдельного игрока, находящегося в топ-300 рейтинга. То, что задумывалось как возрождение DotaProTracker, стало еще более серьезным инструментом - сайт имеет доступ к закрытым тренировочным м

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @casualdotoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“casual” (@casualdotoo), 189 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/casualdotoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.