Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

castle cats confessions🌸

@castlecatsconfessions

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

592subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002792389907
TypeChannel
Username@castlecatsconfessions
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/castlecatsconfessions

Growth

5925945938 Aug 2026, 19:01 — 594 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:16 — 592 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:019 Aug 2026, 14:16
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 592–594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:16592-2
8 Aug 2026, 19:01594first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 592 subscribers
Avg views / post
128
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,797
Reactions total312
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

312 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14847.4%
❤‍🔥4715.1%
🙏3812.2%
🔥216.73%
💘196.09%
👀92.88%
💋92.88%
🕊61.92%
🥰51.60%
🍓30.962%
20.641%
👻20.641%
🏆10.321%
👍10.321%
🙈10.321%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC56 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Знаете почему Ли и Фелисити нет в сюжетке? Я их украл и держу в заложниках #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

8🙏5🕊2

8 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC66 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

привет хреначу Дарлу не факт что дорисую может пакажу хз я ее люблю #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

10👀1👻1💘1🕊1🙏1

8 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC101 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

у неё очень красввый дизайн 🥺🥺🥺 #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

16👀3🙏1

8 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC133 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Неанон мемодел Скарчинов #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

🔥185🍓3👀21❤‍🔥1🙏1

8 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC139 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Держите еще антроБархатку :) Неанон Колючка #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

14🙏3❤‍🔥1💘1

8 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC133 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моим глазам пизда уже но зато закончила рисовать антро-версию своей Гвиневры 😛 Неанон Муняньь Тгк : @munochkaa #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

15💘2🙏2👀1

8 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC129 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всем еще раз драсте , у меня вопросик 10 уровень у котов это максимальный или макс. уровень зависит от ранга/прохождения сюжета ? #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

❤‍🔥9🙏21👀1

8 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC125 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

в честь летнего ивента Хиби мне нужны срочно идеи кто подойдет под такую стилистику/ можно каких то плохишей Amelez #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

18❤‍🔥3💘2

8 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC124 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

сборнички/ спросите из друзей кто вы/ чья эстетика вам подходит/ ваш кинн? #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

13💘3👍1💋1🥰1🙏1

8 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC152 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вообще я хотел показать уже готовый рисунок,но я не знаю что добавить на задний фон чтобы не запартачить его акварелье,поэтому решил у вас спросить,что можно добавить #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

🙏12❤‍🔥43💘2🏆1💋1🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC159 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бедный маленький зашуганный ребенок (( Неанон Колючка #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

❤‍🔥136🥰4💋2💘2🙏1

8 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC158 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну я пыталась сделать с этим что-то нормальное #тейк • @castlecatsconftake_bot

❤‍🔥16💋3🙏3🔥21💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @castlecatsconfessions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 574,103 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“castle cats confessions🌸” (@castlecatsconfessions), 592 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/castlecatsconfessions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.