коллаб с подружкой !!! я наконец сдала все экзамены….
custom 519974248664532568931custom 519971277835653717226custom 534144818518322760015custom 53502875027562959401

Channel
@cassylenia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
232subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003565539030 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cassylenia |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 13 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cassylenia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 232 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 231 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:50 | 231 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 13 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (13 January 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 222 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
958 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5199712778356537172 | 245 | 25.6% | |
| 💋 | 184 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5199742486645325689 | 167 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5350287502756295940 | 121 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5411214594557356620 | 70 | 7.31% | |
| custom 5341448185183227600 | 69 | 7.20% | |
| 🍓 | 46 | 4.80% | |
| custom 5278393581332087660 | 34 | 3.55% | |
| custom 5235663054783393004 | 16 | 1.67% | |
| custom 5352793332705674807 | 6 | 0.626% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 958reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cassylenia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
коллаб с подружкой !!! я наконец сдала все экзамены….
custom 519974248664532568931custom 519971277835653717226custom 534144818518322760015custom 53502875027562959401
это Морган по тик ток трендам 🦇
💋36custom 519971277835653717228custom 519974248664532568913custom 52356630547833930047custom 53502875027562959403
диплом все, шарага все, порисовала с кайфом Нору🎀 у вас как дела как учеба работа?
custom 519971277835653717233custom 534144818518322760029custom 519974248664532568913custom 53527933327056748075custom 52783935813320876603💋2
заказик для подружки который мне очень нравится, попрактиковала складочки заказать комишку
💋39custom 519974248664532568920custom 519971277835653717214
чертилка скетчевая друзи, у меня работа и диплом, а еще собачка сильно болеет уже достаточно долго, я поэтому немного черепаха сейчас в рисовании
custom 535028750275629594050custom 527839358133208766017custom 541121459455735662012
новое видево вышло 🌟смотреть 🌟 название байт, обводки это плохо 🤔 напишите комментик для продвижения!
💋26custom 519971277835653717212custom 54112145945573566204
вкину персонажей (на продажу уйдут) в ночи что то я рендерить разучилась, раньше будто лучше было, надо что ли потренироваться…
custom 535028750275629594031💋16custom 519974248664532568910
всем привет, открываю пару слотов на коммишки (арты на заказ) любого формата цена вопроса: портрет - 1000 руб по пояс - 1600 руб ниже бедер - 1800 руб полнорост - 2000 руб отдельным пунктом - иконки в анфас, как на 5 фотографии - 400 руб скетчевые варианты: без цвета - 20% от фулл прайса; с плоским цветом - 40% от фулл прайса. рисую - людей, человекоподобных (можете на счет остальных уточнять) не рисую - сложные …
custom 535028750275629594018custom 541121459455735662010custom 52356630547833930047custom 51997127783565371721
нора и лейн арт который должен был быть к 14 февраля, но что то я затянула 🍑 (изм.) спасибо за звездочки!
custom 519971277835653717251custom 519974248664532568916custom 534144818518322760012
по канону кассандра всегда планировалась полу азиаткой, так что я решила попробовать немного видоизменить ей глаза😶 заодно за новую аватарку пойдет скоро будет полноценка с девчонками
custom 541121459455735662037custom 535028750275629594018custom 527839358133208766014🍓4custom 53527933327056748071
решила немного редизайнуть персонажек, начала с моих любимых тетенек - вильмы и норы немного обозначила почетче их различия во внешности, чтоб самой не путаться🙂 нора с прямыми волосами омг шик блеск
custom 519974248664532568936💋15custom 534144818518322760013custom 51997127783565371723🍓1
касс лейн - китайская версия, потому что я была в китае админ вышла из спячки дождались ура, зато я славно отдохнула от рисования, теперь опять мотивация появилась 🥺
custom 519971277835653717262custom 519974248664532568927🍓23custom 54112145945573566201
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cassylenia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 69,999 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cass lein” (@cassylenia), 232 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cassylenia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.