Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СТРОИМ БАНК

Channel

СТРОИМ БАНК

@casabank

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

555subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003478459549
TypeChannel
Username@casabank
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 28 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/casabank

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

55557956714 August 2026 — 579 subscribers14 August 2026 — 579 subscribers15 August 2026 — 578 subscribers22 August 2026 — 577 subscribers30 August 2026 — 571 subscribers9 September 2026 — 560 subscribers16 September 2026 — 555 subscribers14 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 33 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 551–583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 11:42555-5
9 Sept 2026, 16:20560-11
30 Aug 2026, 09:27571-6
22 Aug 2026, 17:47577-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:35578-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:30579no change
14 Aug 2026, 17:18579first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,317 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31824.1%
❤‍🔥27220.7%
🔥19214.6%
💯1199.04%
🤝1047.90%
😁675.09%
🆒554.18%
🤯463.49%
👍392.96%
🤗352.66%
👏201.52%
😭141.06%
🍓120.911%
🙈90.683%
😱60.456%
🤣60.456%
👌20.152%
🤪10.076%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 19:44 UTC≈1,200 views252 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Давайте так Мы догадывались, что будет непросто)) Но то, что будет такое, и еще и на самом старте — не догадывались Последний месяц перевернул нишу и рынок вообще с ног на голову и поставил нас сразу в трудное положение На старте этого реалити мы пообещали себе показывать вам всё как есть Не только как всё круто, классно и разъебно Но и не скрывать всех трудностей, когда они будут И даже если ничего не получ

❤‍🔥136💯69🤝40🆒42🔥1

Signed Егор Каменский

20 Apr 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,260 views117 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Когда начинали этот проект > мы понимали, что это важный и непростой проект Однако то, с чем мы столкнулись пару недель назад нас немного ошеломило На днях расскажу подробности и что на каком этапе

57🤯31👍19😱6❤‍🔥2🔥1🤪1

Signed Иван Якунин

9 Apr 2026, 08:39 UTC≈1,850 views57 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Причем это во всех сферах Микроблоги и тд

28🤯15💯13❤‍🔥1

Signed Иван Якунин

9 Apr 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,700 views76 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Почему у нас такого не будет? 1. Потому что внутри системы все транзакции в крипте То есть, даже если ты заводишь рубли, они автоматически конвертятся в крипту А дальше при оплате уже крипта конвертится в нужную валюту А это запретить пока не смогут и не будут + отследить будет сложнее 2. Потому что юр лицензия в другой стране позволяет нам не выдавать информацию о гражданах рф государству и контрольным органа

🔥40🤗2016

Signed Егор Каменский

9 Apr 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,260 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Альфа и тд в то же самое въебались Открывали россиянам таджикские / узбекские и тд карты, чтобы дать возможность оплачивать сервисы и расплачиваться зарубежом Их тоже грохнули спустя пару месяцев

4

Signed Егор Каменский

9 Apr 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,070 views35 reactionsread 14 August 2026

У нас такой подставы не будет!

🤗158🔥7💯3👌2

Signed Иван Якунин

9 Apr 2026, 08:14 UTC≈1,040 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

А это незаметные новости для обладателей казахских карт, которые были популярны в 23-24-25 годах Зеленого банка, так сказать) Будет ли тоже самое с остальными картами, которые открыты без резиденции, вот и думайте…

😭14🙈9😁5

Signed Иван Якунин

9 Apr 2026, 08:11 UTC888 views39 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Крипты не будет Рубли под контролем Уже сейчас блокировки переводов больше 20к рублей 🙂 Вот и думайте… Нормально платить за сервисы уже никто не может За границей карту сделать уже никто не может во многих странах Скоро и внутри России переводы друг другу будут налогом облагаться

17🔥12🤝9❤‍🔥1

Signed Иван Якунин

9 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC827 views26 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Если читаете новости, то в курсе про внедрение цифрового рубля, тотальной слежке за каждым рублем и так далее А также запрет на покупку больше 3к долл в криптовалютах Поэтому мы и делаем решение

🔥20👏6

Signed Иван Якунин

9 Apr 2026, 08:09 UTC846 views46 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Почему мы делаем банк? И почему именно сейчас? Кто читает новости, тот в цирке не смеется Государство может собирать до 440 млрд рублей налогов в год благодаря ужесточению контроля за банковскими переводами. Система обмена данными между налоговой и Центробанком заработает в 2027 году для выявления недекларируемых доходов. В 2025 году через Систему быстрых платежей прошло 103 трлн рублей. Минфин оценивает долю тен

❤‍🔥2115👏10

Signed Иван Якунин

31 Mar 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,270 views126 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Итак, что уже сейчас есть Распишу подробнее, потому что не все читали наши посты в личных каналах 1. Сама идея и концепция банка Онлайн-банк с приложением в телеграме, где за 2 минуты каждый может открыть счет и пополнять его рублями и криптой К счету привязана цифровая карта, которая работает через эпл пэй Делаешь один раз карту и оплачиваешь почти по всему миру (даже в США работает) и в интернете любые покуп

❤‍🔥45🤝40👍20🔥13🤣62

Signed Егор Каменский

30 Mar 2026, 19:09 UTC≈1,120 views84 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Всем ку Окей, название выбрали, что дальше делаем? Варианты? Или в целом можно отдыхать пока?🙂 Что самое важное в банке, без чего смысла вообще нет его начинать??? Пишем версии ⬇️

37🆒26❤‍🔥21

Signed Иван Якунин

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @casabank. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Mar 2026, 15:09 UTCAnonymous Poll367 voters

Как называем банк?

  1. CASA BANK77%
  2. KASSA BANK23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 6 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СТРОИМ БАНК” (@casabank), 555 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/casabank.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.