Channel
@carverfomoo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
118subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003061306070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @carverfomoo |
| Description | Owner: @carverfomo |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 29 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/carverfomoo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 118 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 118 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 88.0% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2025 to 19 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
something big is in the works and i've been sitting on this for too long. been running twitter accounts for a while now, testing everything hooks, formats, what actually gets views, what converts. made a lot of mistakes, learned even more. the new project is gonna be all about that. how to build and run an x account the right way, how to monetize it properly and actually pull decent money from it. not theory, real …
❤3
this channel is dead ngl. the new one is where i’m dropping everything from now on polymarket plays, wallets, the works. hop in https://t.me/+30VZS9E59SdlY2Uy
when i spot the first situation like this on the market i’ll immediately drop a link with the exchange in this channel
❤3
a bit off my usual niche, usually i’m on polymarkets, but this is alpha crypto info how fair price works and how to profit on some exchanges, liquidations happen only at the fair price that’s the average price from several spot exchanges (binance, okx, gate, bybit, mexc). even if the token’s current market price is different, liquidation triggers at fair price. example with moodeng: • current price: 0.23$ • fair…
❤3
yo a lot has piled up lately tons of x updates, new contracts, and i’ve really boosted my media presence in the meantime tomorrow i’ll prepare the first post for you in a while see you
❤6👏3🔥3
Another precision move from @25usdc on @Polymarket. He went NO on Will Gemini 3.0 be released by Nov 15? → Entry at 40¢ exit zone now at 56¢ +40.15% gain, roughly +$1,283 profit on a $3,196 stake. No rumors, no emotion just pattern recognition. He caught the timing right after October legs collapsed and before liquidity rotated into November. That’s how conviction trades look when the market’s still chasing head…
❤1
yoooo boys
they locked the devs. we unlocked the meta. $CRIME isn’t about breaking rules it’s about playing smarter while everyone else gets caught. no warrants. no cuffs. just code. while headlines chase scandals, we mint culture. every block written in defiance, every trade a quiet jailbreak. crime pays when it’s on chain. 5SD9ARptyuDi7ifiHqSUti9T16uNAPDg9vsDcivLpump Trading & tracking him here: https://axiom.trade/@c…
❤2
$fraudcoin the only honest coin on Solana While others fake transparency, $fraudcoin built an empire on irony. It calls itself a scam and that’s exactly why it works. In a market addicted to delusion, honesty becomes the strongest narrative. No roadmap, no promises just perfect satire wrapped in profitability. This isn’t a meme about fraud. > It’s a mirror held up to crypto itself > and the reflection looks dist…
❤1
$GIGACZ the myth forged in the BNB arena Forget subtlety this is meme maximalism in its purest form. $GIGACZ merges two unstoppable archetypes: CZ, the untouchable leader and GigaChad, the internet’s final boss. It’s not just a meme it’s a digital monument. Strength, conviction, dominance compressed into one ticker. Every BNB cycle needs a banner to rally under. This time, it’s the face of absolute confidence. …
❤2
#8 isn’t noise it’s a reset before ignition. We’ve seen this story play out a hundred times dip, disbelief and then the run nobody expected. Liquidity hasn’t left. Volume hasn’t faded. The smart wallets know what’s next. From launch to $9M MC, the chart screamed strength and after a clean cooldown, $8 is coiling again right under resistance. You can feel it the kind of compression that breaks violently upward. T…
#1BNB isn’t just another ticker it’s a command. The phrase “just buy 1BNB” turned from a meme into a movement short, viral and perfectly native to the BNB chain. The pair’s already active on PancakeSwap, fresh eyes flooding in from KOL threads and Telegram raids. Why it works: — The name is the shill no hashtags, no slogans, just a direct call to action. — BNB keyword baked in, making it trend naturally every tim…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @carverfomoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,283,712 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“X Bits of Inflа” (@carverfomoo), 118 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/carverfomoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.