Disney’s new princess…

Channel
Carol Roth
@caroljsroth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002515946456 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caroljsroth |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 11 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caroljsroth |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 9 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 11
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 25s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
I've known Charlie Kirk since he was a teenager. Please, lord, grant a miracle for him and his family.
Today I feel much like I did after October 7th—now I can see some people for who they are. -that you cannot reason with people who want you dead. -that people lean into hate and propaganda without knowing any reality to feed the hate in their own hearts. It’s again a very sad and harrowing day.
Who’s the best dramatic actor of all time?
On what occasion do you wear these? #onwhatoccasion
Wealth-creating behaviors: -Delayed gratification -Consistent investing -Setting and measuring goals -Not voting for commies
There seems to be a misunderstanding of money vs wealth/net worth. The ultra wealthy are not swimming around in a roomful of coins like Scrooge McDuck.
I will be on @NEWSMAX N2 at 12:30 p ET and again at 2p ET-- talking OBBB, economy and more. Join us!
Anyone who believes Marxist drivel has the critical thinking skills of a second grader at most, and shouldn't be allowed to make any meaningful decisions.
My dad was the best. He was the ultimate "character" and taught me + everyone around him fierce loyalty, generosity, a strong work ethic, and how to move through life with laughter and love. Happy Father's Day to all the dads that make their families better. #FathersDay
Protests used to be about important causes. Now they're just an excuse to be an asshole.
People are sending graduation announcements, wedding invites and more to brands and companies to try to get free stuff. Clever or tacky? Discuss...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @caroljsroth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 936,849 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@caroljsroth named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Carol Roth” (@caroljsroth), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caroljsroth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.