Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [🔒] 𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒅𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒐𝒖𝒍.✧

Channel

[🔒] 𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒅𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒐𝒖𝒍.✧

@cardsofthesoul

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

108subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003686074700
TypeChannel
Username@cardsofthesoul
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cardsofthesoul

Growth

107108107.529 August 2026 — 107 subscribers29 August 2026 — 107 subscribers6 September 2026 — 108 subscribers29 August 20266 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 21:19108+1
29 Aug 2026, 19:15107no change
29 Aug 2026, 19:02107first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.4%
avg views ÷ 108 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.8
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held15 (21 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total882
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓4067.8%
💘610.2%
46.78%
🍾35.08%
💔35.08%
🍌23.39%
💋11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC46 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

за эту ситуацию я уже извинилась, мне правда стыдно. не вижу смысла писать мне гадкие слова и особенно желать см#рти

🍓41💘1

25 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC49 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

всем опять привет, хотела бы поговорить на тему пожеланий мне см#рти и гадких слов. воспринимайте меня как человека, я тоже ранимая и чувствую обиды, надеюсь впредь таких слов в свою сторону я видеть не буду, всем спасибо за понимание ❣ будьте добрее

🍓7💘32

25 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

все сделанное скинула, еще раз извиняюсь перед теми, кому не сделала коллажи ☹️ знала, что не надо брать столько людей и все равно взяла(

🍓1

25 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

также вы можете найти меня в моем сайде, если захотите продолжить следить за мной!

🍓1

25 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC58 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

мои личка и анонка всегда открыты для вас, я также открыта для общения и знакомств, спасибо вам за все, я люблю вас

🍓1

25 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

черкиссы, всем привет! ❣ я до последнего оттягивала это, но.. пожалуй, время пришло. я решила, что больше не хочу вести этот канал, он не дает мне дышать, да и в последнее время я чувствую себя не очень. это решение взвешенное, и не принятое за пять минут, об этом я думала уже пару месяцев точно. я продолжу собирать картон, но теперь без канала - думаю, мне и правда так будет легче. возможно, в будущем когда я разбер

🍓1💔1

24 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

всем привет джитаки у соула в инст.

🍓5

23 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC60 viewsread 29 August 2026

в теории вам будет грустно если я закроюсь

23 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

я в крашлисте у диши! загляните посмотреть ее прекрасную нью эру ❣

🍓3

23 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC38 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @gghosttikk

я создала группу для общения виллэнс! 🌟 буду рада, если зайдете) https://t.me/+u6MF5JaaSiszZTUy

🍓3

22 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

спасибо за дневной анон, все в архиве! раньше была занята прохождением салли фейс, поэтому не почистила сразу..

🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @cardsofthesoul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[🔒] 𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒅𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒐𝒖𝒍.✧” (@cardsofthesoul), 108 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cardsofthesoul.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.