Channel
@cardiokim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
659subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001571072151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cardiokim |
| Description | Ким Глеб - кардиохирург, кандидат наук 100% свежий взгляд от настоящего кардиохирурга! Азбука кардиохирургии 📚 • Мотивация • Кардиохирургия • Кардиология • Стартапы • Лайфхаки |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cardiokim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 659 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 659 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 36.5% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 27.1% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 12.5% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 6.25% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 4.17% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну что, и снова здравствуйте! 👋 Несмотря на все преграды, мы продолжаем вещать. Словно наша яхта, упрямо летящая к Гибралтару сквозь шторм, мы идём вперёд. Законы антихрупкости жестки: либо ты ломаешься, либо подстраиваешься под ветер. Мы выбрали второе. Коротко по хронологии нашего «Одиссея» (который раз мог стать финальным, но каждый раз оказывался эпичным): ⚓ Выход из Португалии. Обогнули её с запада и сразу ны…
👍6🤣2
Photo, posted without a caption
P.S. Важное исправление В прошлый раз в пост закралась забавная опечатка, но, как говорится, нет худа без добра — благодаря этому я вижу, что вы действительно внимательно читаете наши посты 😉 Напоминаю, что приведенная выше статья была приурочена ко Дню медицинского работника и вышла на портале Наша версия при поддержке продюсерского центра Арины Шараповой. Держите корректную ссылку: 🔗 https://versia.ru/kardioxirurg…
❤4👍4
Друзья, коллеги, соратники! Позвольте от всей души поздравить всех причастных с нашим профессиональным праздником! В этот день желаю вам неиссякаемой выдержки, железного внимания к деталям и постоянного стремления к совершенствованию своих знаний и навыков. Наша работа требует максимальной собранности, и я горжусь тем, что мы вместе несем эту нелегкую, но благородную миссию. Особенный год для нашей кафедры В этом го…
😍5👍3
Друзья, вышла статья, в которой рассказывается о том, как сейчас продвигаются наши проекты и что ждёт впереди! Переходите по ссылке👇🏻 https://versia.ru/kardioxirurg-gleb-kim-o-svoej-rabote-sporte-i-iskusstvennom-intellekte
❤2😁2👍1🤔1
Атлантический океан зовёт 🌬️🌊⛵️ Наш путь начался с мыса, на котором обосновался городок Пениши. Сразу же нас встретили великолепные виды, потрясающий закат и величие открытого океана! Весь западный берег Португалии обильно омывается внушительными волнами Аталантики. Мы как бывалые люди знали об этом и были морально готовы к разным исходам. Но даже нам было значимо тяжело пережить первую ночь под аккомпанемент четыр…
❤4🔥3😱2😨1
Video, posted without a caption
👍4❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3👍2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cardiokim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,259,332 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO • Cardiac Surgery • Кардиохирургия простым языком” (@cardiokim), 659 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cardiokim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.