Channel
@carboncreate
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
686subscribers
+641 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003528623118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @carboncreate |
| Created | 20 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/carboncreate |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 686 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 682 | +63 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 619 | +177 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 442 | +377 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 65 | +20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 45 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
47 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 68.1% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 23.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 8.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
درباره مطالب علمی که میگم یه چیزی بگم، برای کسانی که من رو نمیشناسند😁: من از بچگی خیلی علاقه به تحقیق و مطالعه داشتم. از زمان مدرسه تقریبا هر سمینار و کارگاهی حتی تو دانشگاه ها بود شرکت میکردم یا دعوت میشدم. تو زمان دبیرستان عضو خانه ریاضی و پژوهشسرا بودم و کلی کلاس های علمی و فنی و نمایشگاه برگزار میکردیم. و در دوران دانشگاه هم عضو ارشد تیم تحقیقاتی حوزه شیمی چندتا دانشگاه بودم و کارم برسی منابع و نوشتن مقاله بود …
❤5
اصلا کافئین که بود و چه کرد؟ آیا باعث هشیاری میشه یا فقط یه ماسک موقت برای پنهان کردن خستگی نهفته ماست؟ #علمی
👍3❤1
درباره نوع عملکرد کافئین هم یه توضیح کوتاه بدم: 👇(راستی، مرسی که ریپلای میکنین من خیلی خوشحال میشم که تو بحث ها شرکت میکنید^_^)
❤4
راستی من قراره خیلی مطالب هیجان انگیزی اینجا بزارم، و چون category-freak هستم، به زودی یه راهنمای مطالب هم اضافه میکنم 👀
🔥4❤1
خط آبی، سریع نوشیدن قهوه است و نقطهچین سبز، آروم آروم نوشیدن.
❤2
درباره اینکه چرا سرعت نوشیدن قهوه روی میزان عملکرد کافئین تو بدن ما تاثیر داره #علمی
❤6
یکی از چیزهایی که همیشه برام سوال بوده، اینه چرا وقتی خونه قهوه درست میکنم، بعدش سریع خوابم میبره. (در حد کمتر از نیم ساعت!) ولی وقتی بیرون قهوه میخورم، تو کافهای جایی، همیشه خیلییی بیشتر من رو بیدار و هشیار نگه میداره. همه جور مدل هم امتحان کردم. اسپرسو، با شیر، فرانسه، ترک، درصد و رُست های مختلف… حتی از همون کافه دونه قهوه رو گرفتم اومدم خونه درست کردم، باز خوابم برد🥸 امیدوارم تنها نباشم :)))
❤2
در باب بیبرقی و قهوهی دالگونای سرد
❤3
من، در انتظار پاییز:
❤8
Tell me why are you still so afraid? Hm?
نمیدونم چرا ما همش فکر میکنیم خیلیییی دیره ولی در واقع مبدا شروع زمان رو خودمون تعیین و تعریف میکنیم، نه اون چیزی که جامعه برای ما دیکته کرده. اگه الان نه، پس کِی؟
👍8
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @carboncreate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کربن ✏️” (@carboncreate), 686 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/carboncreate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.