Video, posted without a caption
custom 53166386845550011015custom 52537264245099974393custom 52557350175055895571
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬

Channel
@caramelsky89
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
67subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001956561999 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caramelsky89 |
| Description | Всем привет! Добро пожаловать в этот канал, здесь будут опубликлвываться разные штучки и иногда рисунки🦋 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caramelsky89 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 67 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 67 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (9 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 392 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253726424509997439 | 24 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5316638684555001101 | 18 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5255735017505589557 | 11 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5370770167431183610 | 11 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5219721544929941631 | 10 | 9.26% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 4.63% | |
| custom 5244967010508482580 | 1 | 0.926% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
custom 53166386845550011015custom 52537264245099974393custom 52557350175055895571
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
SIX SEVEEN Я вас очень люблю 😇
🎉7custom 53707701674311836103custom 53166386845550011012
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
У меня начался артблок, но зато я не разучилась делать макияжы
custom 53166386845550011018custom 52557350175055895575custom 53707701674311836103custom 52537264245099974391
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 От: @weestashish В честь аж 500 подписчиков, мне подкинули идею организовать вам лотерею на комишку. Организовывать конкурсы пока нету настроения, так что вот так вот. 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔡 - подписка на канал - репост в свой тгк/пиар чат на +500 человек/трём друзьям - в комментарии кидаете пруфы и свой порядковый номер(тоесть первый человек кидает пруфы, пишет "1", второй делает тоже самое и пишет "2". Ну вы п…
❤3
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟👁 “Draw This In Your Style” — нарисуй в своём стиле От CaramelSky Спасибо огромное всем за 60 подписчиков! Я вас всех очень ценю и люблю, поэтому решаю устроить небольшой интерактив! ⭐️Условия: — Нарисовать этот арт в своём стиле. — Быть подписанным на канал — Сделать репост этого поста в свой тгк или в пиар чат/лс трем друзьям, если у вас нет тгк(в двух последних случаях скриншоты репостов кидать вместе с арт…
custom 52537264245099974397custom 52197215449299416313custom 52557350175055895573custom 53707701674311836101
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6custom 52197215449299416312custom 53166386845550011012
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
Сегодня я эмо🦋
custom 52537264245099974396👍3custom 53707701674311836103custom 53166386845550011011
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
Выпускаю картинку заранее. Сейчас я участвую в ивенте, но в будущем планирую устроить ивент сама, поэтому ждите новостей 😇
custom 52537264245099974397👍2custom 52197215449299416312custom 52449670105084825801
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
Первый раз делаю что-то подобное, но надеюсь вам очень понравится 😇 Буду рада, если кто-то до конца до смотрит и свое мнение скажет. Понимаю, что о лоре моей вселенной и персов почти никто не знает, но если хотите - дайте знать. Это очень важная тема для меня, поэтому, если получу отклик буду безумно рада. Всех люблю! 💌 #ос #Важное
❤5custom 52197215449299416313custom 52557350175055895572custom 53707701674311836101
Signed 𝓛𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝔂⌬
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @caramelsky89. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 631,174 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚂𝚔𝚢 | 🦋” (@caramelsky89), 67 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caramelsky89.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.