Channel
@captainbareysha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
132subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002443040191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @captainbareysha |
| Description | Своими словами о том, что я люблю и чем живу: рынки капиталов и PE/VC, история, дипломатия и геополитика, ЗОЖ, стратегия, ЧГК, языки, книги и фильмы, горы и море, города и архитектура, флора и фауна. Конечно, семья, друзья и коллеги! Welcome on board |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/captainbareysha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 132 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 132 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
81 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 38.3% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 29.6% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 19.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 9.88% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 2.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
вообще, более открытого миру эмитента чем Инкаб я в последние годы не встречал. чисто для примера: они сознательно полностью раскрыли условия лок-апа, не ограничившись рекомендуемым ЦБ минимумом (который, если откровенно, не особо полезен для инвесторов). Инкаб не стал на этом крайне сложном рынке делать инвесторам оферты об обратном выкупе акций через год-два-три, если цена акций не вырастет к цене размещения (как …
👍8❤🔥3🔥2
друзья, коллеги, вчера успешно завершилась важная для меня история – IPO Инкаба. фото передают атмосферу вчерашнего дня: радость основателя Инкаба Александра Смильгевича – человека, дошедшего до финиша с победой (уверен, что для него этот финиш промежуточный на пути к новым вызовам и целям). ну и мою гордость за проделанную работу. скажу честно, временами было сложно и немного седых волос в моей эспаньолке точно до…
🔥10❤3❤🔥1
С Днем Победы, дорогие друзья и подписчики! Мирного нам всем неба и несокрушимой готовности за него бороться!
❤8🫡2❤🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥5❤2❤🔥1
Прекрасный солнечный день завершился для нас в Талашкино (оно же Флёново). Наверняка вы много слышали об этом удивительном месте или даже были в нем до нас. Вкратце, это имение, купленное князем и княгиней Тенишевыми у подруги, где Мария Клавдиевна Тенишева создала настоящую арт-деревню, мастерские и школу. Здесь работали Врубель, Рерих, Репин, Малютин, Стравинский и многие другие. Рисунки на балалайках, которые вы в…
❤8🔥2❤🔥1
В ближайшие дни будет много постов про этот прекрасный город на Днепре, прославленный не только вампирами средней полосы. Да, "съемочная группа" капитана Барейши в Смоленске
👍3🔥3❤🔥1
Пара обещанных официальных фото с церемонии биржевого колокола по IPO B2B-РТС. Это было круто и местами непросто в процессе, это было успешно и душевно в конце, и вот это в прошлом. все объявления сделаны, фанфары отгремели. Идем к новым успехам для наших клиентов, уже в составе Better Chance.
❤10👍5🔥2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @captainbareysha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 686,576 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Капитан Барейша” (@captainbareysha), 132 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/captainbareysha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.