Channel
@capcoinerc20
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
83subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002035836457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @capcoinerc20 |
| Created | 16 January 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/capcoinerc20 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 83 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 84 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 84 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 16 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
58 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 27.6% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 15.5% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 15.5% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 12.1% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 12.1% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 12.1% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2024 to 16 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://twitter.com/capcoinerc20/status/1747262197456413143 为什么盖币会火的两大原因 1.电影《反贪风暴之加密危机》是国内首部有着大量篇幅描写币圈的电影，同时多次提到了盖币，因为是香港电影，剧中有说有说着加密货币是未来的趋势。很多国家都炒币这种话，这点可以类比前段时间的爆火剧《繁花》，就连大a的相关概念股也在一段时间内有拉升，而对比a股盖币目前仅有几十万美元上下的市值，这个空间更令人浮想联翩。 2.目前eth链上资金火热，新一轮meme小牛来袭，国人meme在不同时期内都有过鼎盛的代表，如今更不能缺席，永远不要瞧不上加密世界的中国力量，盖币这个名字就很据meme属性，lp燃烧，0税收更加便于传播
👍10❤8👎7👏3
Capcoin is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human
👍2
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xe9c5a910806cabc6700f5524f1d92f66b98f30cbe1ce4f79e6d4ed7192911146 在拉黑掉恶意砸合约购入大量供应量的科学家后（正常买家并不受影响），我们合约弃权，接下来是我们月亮之旅的开始 Uncloggers blacklisted，now the journy to moon just begins
💩7👍4😱2🤣1
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9c16c52a2de6302138365f3578e09f927aca68a69a455650145cdb36562e439a 底池燃烧 LP BURNED
🤣6👏4👎2🔥1
我们在银行投资盖币买卖
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @capcoinerc20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,150,143 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Capcoin” (@capcoinerc20), 83 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/capcoinerc20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.