Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for #๐—พ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜‡๐˜†

Channel

#๐—พ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜‡๐˜†

@canal_sikret

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

204subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002949304098
TypeChannel
Username@canal_sikret
Created16 October 2025 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/canal_sikret

Growth

187206196.57 August 2026 โ€” 187 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 187 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 206 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 205 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 206 subscribers13 September 2026 โ€” 204 subscribers2047 August 202613 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 184โ€“209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 14:40204-2
29 Aug 2026, 08:05206+1
22 Aug 2026, 12:39205-1
14 Aug 2026, 22:06206+19
8 Aug 2026, 12:05187no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:09187first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 16 October 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

438 reactions across 1 post, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customย 538654468466123166916136.8%
customย 531913824385212465610524.0%
customย 52831052678299972429221.0%
customย 5204181442719928027204.57%
customย 5267055726664107725204.57%
customย 5269659121090581524204.57%
customย 5458411925748599123204.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 16 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
134
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 1 we hold a reading for ยท 100%
Most on one post
134
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @canal_sikret. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 2 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 October 2025 to 16 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2025, 08:56 UTCโ‰ˆ2,800 views438 reactions134 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

โ€ผ๏ธ๐–“๐–Ž๐–ˆ๐–๐–“๐–†๐–’๐–Š - qwizy โšก ๐Ÿค” ๐ŸŽƒ๐’–๐’”๐’†๐’“๐’๐’‚๐’Ž๐’† - ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿšซ @qwizy_o_o โžฟโžฟโžฟ ๐Ÿ›ถ ๐’Ž๐’š ๐’„๐’‰๐’‚๐’๐’๐’†๐’ - https://t.me/canal_qwizy_o_o ๐Ÿ˜€ โžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟ โ˜ ๏ธ๐’Ž๐’š ๐’„๐’‰๐’‚๐’• - https://t.me/flo_oo11 โ„๏ธ โžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟ ๐Ÿชฆ ๐’๐’–๐’Ž๐’ƒ๐’†๐’“ - ????????๐Ÿ—ก โžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟ ๐Ÿฅฒ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐ˆ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž - ๐‘๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐š ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ โžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟ โš ๏ธ ๐’„๐’๐’‚๐’๐’”: ๐’š๐’†๐’”๐Ÿ˜€ โžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟ โ˜ ๏ธ ๐ฆ๐š๐ฒ ๐๐ž๐Ÿ๐Ÿ:?๐Ÿ˜€ โžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟ ๐Ÿ˜๐ญ๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ค๐จ๐ฏ,๐ง๐ž ๐›๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ ๐ข ๐ง๐ž ๐›๐ฎ๐๐ž๐ญ,๐ž๐๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฏ๐ž๐ง๐ง๐ฒ๐ฒ ๐š๐ค๐ค๐š๐ฎ๐ง๐ญโœจ ๏ธŽ ๏ธŽโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟโžฟ โŒจ๏ธ @qwizy_o_o โšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธโšก๏ธ

customย 5386544684661231669161customย 5319138243852124656105customย 528310526782999724292customย 520418144271992802720customย 526705572666410772520customย 526965912109058152420customย 545841192574859912320

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @canal_sikret. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ#๐—พ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜‡๐˜†โ€ (@canal_sikret), 204 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canal_sikret.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.