Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Каллиграфический ДОМ

@calligraphycheb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002600577932
TypeChannel
Username@calligraphycheb
DescriptionСтудия каллиграфии, город Чебоксары https://vk.com/calligraphycheb
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/calligraphycheb

Growth

376 August 2026 — 37 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:3137no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:1837first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.9%
avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (9 March 20265 August 2026)
Views total51
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
30
Videos
11
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
46s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52493696698144785415574.3%
custom 5341700944008610859810.8%
custom 532138248022840224745.41%
custom 534160105595419447534.05%
custom 525164885863461016722.70%
custom 522224172865998836611.35%
custom 544299627880593329711.35%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC18 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Работа с печатными буквицами гостит в Санкт-Петербургском Союзе Художников на выставке каллиграфии «Образ и Буква — 2026. Выставку можно посетить с 4 по 16 августа.

custom 52493696698144785414

25 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC33 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Xim4itkaPhoto

1 августа во дворе Чувашского национального музея — «БОЛЬШОЙ ПЛЕНЭР» проекта ХимЧитка! 🗣 В первой части мероприятия Анна Рузавина — свободный художник-орнаменталист, каллиграф, преподаватель творческой мастерской Каллиграфический ДОМ — проведёт лекцию-погружение «Суть каллиграфии». На лекции мы поговорим о каллиграфии. Познакомимся с каллиграфическими инструментами, их возможностями и особенностями работы с ними. С

custom 52493696698144785415

3 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52493696698144785411custom 53213824802284022471

3 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC51 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Благодаря юбилейной 15-ой конференции "Перья-крылья" завела наконец каллиграфический скетчбук

custom 52493696698144785412custom 53417009440086108592

16 Jun 2026, 20:44 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @pishuperom_krdVideo

Леонид Иванович Проненко известен как автор популярной книги "Каллиграфия для всех". Мало кто знает, что он написал еще одну книгу, которую не успел издать. В книге собраны его замечательные каллиграфические байки, более 100 его собственных работ и более 200 работ его студентов. Подробно про книгу здесь - pishuperom.ru/book. Книга была готова к изданию осенью 2021 года. Но зимой этого же года Мастера не стало. Сейча

custom 52493696698144785411custom 54429962788059332971

21 May 2026, 08:10 UTC62 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52493696698144785416custom 53213824802284022471

27 Apr 2026, 05:52 UTC81 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Исследую исторические образцы книжного орнамента

custom 52493696698144785417custom 52516488586346101672custom 53416010559541944752

3 Apr 2026, 06:17 UTC92 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Буквица М из Фряской Азбуки 1822 года. М - Мама - Молитва - Мечта - Мир Каллиграфический дом ВКонтакте Каллиграфический дом в МАХ

custom 52493696698144785416

25 Mar 2026, 17:55 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Есть книжные планы на апрель и повод для практики. Каллиграфический дом ВКонтакте Каллиграфический дом в МАХ

custom 52493696698144785413

23 Mar 2026, 09:28 UTC90 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Всё течёт, всё меняется. События диктуют находить новые способы коммуникации. И пока физические стены моего Каллиграфического дома ещё не воздвигнуты, я буду рада каждому на страницах своих социальных страниц. Каллиграфический дом ВКонтакте Каллиграфический дом в МАХ

custom 52493696698144785412custom 53213824802284022472

19 Mar 2026, 14:51 UTC68 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Буквица 💫 из Фряской Азбуки 1822 года. 💫 - основа - озарение - ОРНАМЕНТ Древнерусская каллиграфия (да и не только наша), тесно идёт с орнаментом геометрическим или растительным. Всё то, что мне раскрывается в последнее время, подводит к тому, что Орнамент 🔹это праязык, 🔹это предтеча письменности, 🔹это не просто украшение, а способ передать информацию о сокрытом, о духовном мировоззрении носителя той или иной куль

custom 52493696698144785416custom 53417009440086108592custom 52222417286599883661

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @calligraphycheb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 898,502 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Каллиграфический ДОМ” (@calligraphycheb), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/calligraphycheb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.