Channel
@cahilbertspace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003821263613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cahilbertspace |
| Description | Central Asian Hilbert Space (CAHS) Where CA explores the quantum frontier. for any collab. pls dm @ilshatrozy |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 3 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cahilbertspace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 48 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 48 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 49 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,257 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
46 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 91.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle: Why the Universe Hides ⚛️ Try to photograph a speeding bullet. Use a long exposure and you catch how fast it flies — but it's a useless blur. You have no idea where it is. Take a sharp snapshot instead and you nail its exact spot — but now it's frozen, telling you nothing about its speed. Speed or position. You can't get both. In everyday life, that's just a camera problem. Bett…
❤2🥰1
The Experiment That Broke Reality: The Double-Slit⚛️ Richard Feynman said this single experiment holds "the only mystery" of quantum physics. Everything strange about the quantum world is already hiding inside it. Here's the setup. Take a wall with two thin slits cut into it. Fire tiny particles — electrons — at it, one single electron at a time. Behind the wall is a screen that records where each one lands. Commo…
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
arigato guzaimassss
❤4
Funny yet quirky part of QGSS-26 is that there's always a Japanese translation of each lab 😅
It's actually a Qiskit's logo :)
does it remind you something?
what it (QSphere) shows: The QSphere has two dots, one near the top and one near the bottom. They are the two basis states in equal superposition, linked by entanglement.
beautiful isn't it?
❤5
Really interesting video about Ewin Tang's journey in quantum algorithms. She disproves and, at the same time, proposes the possibilities of quantum system across its applications. She was published at Forbes, won Breakthrough award, and finished undergraduate school at 18. I love the fact that she shares one of my perspectives: the quantum's extensive potential in recreating physical processes. As Richard Feynman …
❤3
Bohr and Einstein at Paul Ehrenfest's home in Leiden, December 1925. Photo by Ehrenfest — a close friend of both men. Two years before the argument began.
❤3
Einstein vs. Bohr: The Greatest Argument in Science⚛️ You know the story. 1927, Einstein slams the table: "God does not play dice!" Bohr fires back: "Einstein, stop telling God what to do!" Neither line was ever said that way. And the real story is so much better. What they were fighting about: Bohr said an electron has no definite position until you look. Not "we don't know where it is" — it genuinely doesn't hav…
🔥3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cahilbertspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 824,652 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CA Hilbert Space” (@cahilbertspace), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cahilbertspace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.