Channel
@caffeineart
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
283subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001484363613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caffeineart |
| Description | π± https://caffeine3.carrd.co π¬ @caffeine3 πͺ² Commissions open NO MINORS |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caffeineart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 283 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 283 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 282 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 July 2026 β 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,337 |
| Reactions total | 84 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
161 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 141 | 87.6% | |
| π₯ | 18 | 11.2% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 2 | 1.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I got myself a Fuji camera and will start my journey toward doing photography more seriously. Do you want to see my photography here or on a different channel?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
One last revenge for Caffeine3 I drew on yesterday but could not quite finish #artfight #giftart
β€8π₯1
Tides | #artfight26 Attack for Belfaunn! βοΈSee attack page here!
β€6
β¨ July Raffle winner is GreyL0ng! β¨ Congratulations, thank you everyone for your continued support β€οΈ I'll be back with the August raffle announcement soon!
Today's lesson | #artfight26 Revenge for TrashJeanie! βοΈSee attack page here!
β€8
Master of mischief | #artfight26 Attack for @corruptedfox! βοΈSee attack page here!
β€8π₯2
Deep Red | #artfight26 Attack for Raraszek! Nude version in the comments! βοΈSee attack page here!
β€13
Have a great weekend, everyone! π Hereβs my return attack, which I had planned earlier for @caffeine3 Thanks again for the amazing attack!
β€7
June ko-fi raffle prize for Tarmis! Tarmis gifted his raffle win to his girlfriend. For a monthly raffle and exclusive content visit my ko-fi! βοΈ
β€5
Polka dot bikini | #artfight26 Attack for Puppypound! I love their art and Apple is such a fun characterβ€οΈ βοΈSee attack page here!
β€12β€βπ₯2
Electrified | #artfight26 Attack for @creepyraccoon! Ruth is used to being experimented on so I used her for trying out some markers :P βοΈSee attack page here!
β€11π₯1
05, revenge attack for caffeine, i loved this characters design at first sight π©· i hardly ever see smooth collies!
β€11π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @caffeineart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
I got myself a Fuji camera and will start my journey toward doing photography more seriously. Do you want to see my photography here or on a different channel?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΏππππππ’π§π'π¬ πππ¬π [κ±κ°α΄‘/Ι΄κ±κ°α΄‘]β (@caffeineart), 283 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caffeineart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.