Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

I᥊ Бездна (🥩)

@cadvrx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

176subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728549754
TypeChannel
Username@cadvrx
Created19 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cadvrx

Growth

175176175.512 Aug 2026, 23:47 — 175 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 06:54 — 176 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:4713 Aug 2026, 06:54
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:54176+1
12 Aug 2026, 23:47175first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

409 reactions across 6 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 587087580719009819811327.6%
custom 58660499432816057745513.4%
custom 52403424646020858574110.0%
custom 5238124865612976538399.54%
custom 5215539247511006139317.58%
custom 5402270930753829377307.33%
custom 4990451191327491300245.87%
custom 4990036361911207842184.40%
custom 5215478632637560068133.18%
custom 5346166120858559720133.18%
custom 5240440149338264987122.93%
custom 5312245783414744883122.93%
custom 524010881408621699581.96%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
118
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
105
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cadvrx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC626 views123 reactions105 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 586604994328160577455custom 540227093075382937730custom 521547863263756006813custom 534616612085855972013custom 531224578341474488312

5 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 12 August 2026

Answers: 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 تگاتون برداشته شده میتونید پاک کنید.

4 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC702 views127 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 587087580719009819865custom 521553924751100613931custom 524034246460208585731

4 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC631 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🩸🩸 don't deal with outsiders very well, they say newcomers have a certain smell..🩸 🌟🌟Yeah, 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 issues, not to mention, they say they can smell your intentions 🌟

custom 499045119132749130024custom 523812486561297653824custom 499003636191120784218custom 587087580719009819813

4 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC459 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔠ll my friends are heathens, take it slow🤩 🩸Wait for them to ask you who you know

custom 587087580719009819835

25 Jun 2026, 22:50 UTC481 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤍let every thought thread a weft of yarn 🪦 weaving through the warps, a tapestry of 🤩🤩🖤

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cadvrx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“I᥊ Бездна (🥩)” (@cadvrx), 176 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cadvrx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.