Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Caterina | c.vas.d

@c_vas_d

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

484subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725828482
TypeChannel
Username@c_vas_d
Created23 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/c_vas_d

Growth

484485484.57 Aug 2026, 17:40 — 485 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:32 — 485 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:28 — 484 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:408 Aug 2026, 10:28
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 484–485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:28484-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:32485no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:40485first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52447109960979035886273.8%
custom 54452669421159870382226.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 05:01 UTC232 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @posterinoPhoto

Igor Gurovich

custom 524471099609790358810custom 54452669421159870383

28 May 2026, 14:42 UTC887 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

РЖД изобрели машину времени, и суббота наступила сегодня 🥳 Кая, с приездом в Москву! Обеспечила меня мерчем и открыткой для сбора автографов 🌯😊

custom 524471099609790358813custom 54452669421159870383

28 May 2026, 09:58 UTC204 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Спасибо BUBBLE за супергеройский подарок и за гача-обложки! Буду с удовольствием читать комикс «Атланты. Том 1. Миссия 1. На страже будущего», погружаться в новую историю 📖 Теперь хочется все обложки собрать! 📕

custom 544526694211598703810custom 52447109960979035887

15 May 2026, 05:25 UTC225 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Одна неделя из жизни

custom 524471099609790358820custom 54452669421159870383

13 May 2026, 05:26 UTC230 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 524471099609790358812custom 54452669421159870383

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @c_vas_d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Caterina | c.vas.d” (@c_vas_d), 484 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_vas_d.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.