Channel
@c_scaevola
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
364subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002127744440 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @c_scaevola |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/c_scaevola |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 364 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 364 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (7 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,891 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
62 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 36 | 58.1% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 29.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 11.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Escolha pela qualidade da biologia e lembre-se de que o intelecto é herdado da mãe, o caráter do pai. BAP, Bronze Age Mindset O verdadeiro propósito do casamento não é a felicidade, mas a procriação e a criação de indivíduos superiores. Friedrich Nietzsche, A Gaia Ciência
⚡6
Meus ancestrais eram da nobreza polonesa: herdei deles meus instintos, incluindo, talvez, também o "liberum veto". Friedrich Nietzsche, Ecce Homo O Liberum Veto era uma regra que dizia que, no parlamento da Comunidade Polaco-Lituana, bastava uma única pessoa dizer "não" para impedir que qualquer decisão fosse aprovada; isso incluía tudo o que foi conversado na reunião. Nietzsche menciona uma metáfora para a recusa a…
⚡5
"Justiça" social... mas por que apenas "social"... por que limitar suas ambições a tanto... vocês querem dizer apenas as opiniões da maioria? Quem se importa. Aqui está a minha visão da verdadeira justiça, a justiça da natureza: os zoológicos abertos, predadores soltos em dezenas, centenas... quatro mil lobos famintos devastando as ruas dessas cidades densamente povoadas, elefantes e bisões em estampida, os edifícios…
❤5⚡3
O socialismo — como conclusão lógica da tirania dos menos favorecidos e dos mais ignorantes, isto é, daqueles que são superficiais, invejosos e atores de três quartos — é de fato consequência das "ideias modernas" e seu anarquismo latente; mas no ar tépido do bem-estar democrático, a capacidade de chegar a conclusões, ou de finalizá-las, enfraquece. Nietzsche, Além do Bem e do Mal
⚡6
Como me fazem rir os socialistas, com seu otimismo tolo sobre o "bom homem" que está à espreita por trás dos arbustos, desde que apenas a "ordem" existente seja abolida e todos os "instintos naturais" sejam liberados. E a oposição é igualmente ridícula, porque não reconhece a violência inerente à lei, a dureza e o egoísmo presentes em qualquer forma de autoridade. "Eu e os meus semelhantes" querem governar e prevale…
⚡2❤2
https://youtu.be/m2SdyuGvV3U?is=DVsO8k88fgaR1tFL
⚡2
“O que torna alguém heroico? — Enfrentar simultaneamente o seu maior sofrimento e a sua mais elevada esperança.” — Nietzsche @philosunwarchannel
⚡3
Duvide de qualquer um que use Nietzsche e a defesa da China no mesmo movimento ou pensamento político. O chinês representa mais do que qualquer povo o "cansado do mundo". E o governo socialista nada mais é do que o triunfo da ralé. Os Manchus, um povo nobre que já governou o Oriente, viam os chineses (hans) como servos, e seu respeito era pelos tibetanos.
👍3
As consequências da extinção de raças são variadas, incluindo, por exemplo, uma filosofia pessimista e a fraqueza de vontade. Exploração voluptuosa do momento, com espasmos histéricos e uma tendência ao horripilante. Sinais de velhice também podem incluir esperteza e avareza (China), frieza. A Europa sob a influência de uma mentalidade temerosa e escravista: uma espécie inferior triunfa — um estranho conflito entr…
⚡1
Nunca confunda com o Irã. A República Islâmica não representa a continuação do Império Persa, mas, pelo contrário, o seu fim até então.
👍3
Tive que dar crédito a Zaratustra, um persa: os persas foram os primeiros a conceber a história em grande escala. Uma sucessão de acontecimentos, cada um presidido por um profeta. Cada profeta tinha seu hazar, seu reino de mil anos. Nietzsche, Fragmentos Póstumos de 1884–1885.
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @c_scaevola. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 990,710 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Círculo de Scaevola” (@c_scaevola), 364 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_scaevola.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.