Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 26 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 366–367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 07:05
366
-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:48
367
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:54
367
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4
57.1%
👌
3
42.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پرسیدند که آیا دریا زن است یا مرد؟!
این چه پرسشی است!؟
دریا اسم دختره
آیا توجه کرده اید !
وقتی که به بالا نگاه می کنیم
آسمان ، خورشید ، ستاره ، ناهید ، زهره ، مهتاب ، باران ، به نامِ خانمهاست؛
به دریا نگاه می کنیم
مروارید، صدف، موج ، پری ،
به نام خانومهاست . !
به باغچه نگاه میکنیم
شبنم ، مریم ، نسترن ، رز ، ، نرگس ، یاس ، نیلوفر ، لاله ،
به نام خانم هاست .
به دشت نگاه میکنیم
آهو ، غزال ، گلشن ، کژال به نام خانمه…
مشکل اینجا بود که کنار میآمدیم!
رنجمان میدادند، کنار میآمدیم،
درکمان نمیکردند، کنار میآمدیم،
احترام نمیگذاشتند، کنار میآمدیم،
ارزش قائل نمیشدند، کنار میآمدیم.
آنقدر گذشتیم و کنار آمدیم و سازگار شدیم، که عادت ما شد کنار آمدن و عادت آدمهای مقابلِ ما شد؛ اهمیت ندادن و کنار گذاشتن!
مقصر، پدران و مادران ما بودند! باید مطالبهگر و متوقع بارمان میآوردند،
باید از همان ابتدا، زیر میز زدن را یادمان میدادند!
@c_i_g…
آدمیزاد فقط با آب و نان و هوا
نيست که زنده است؛
اين را دانستم و میدانم كه آدم
به آدم است كه زنده است،
آدم به عشقِ آدم زنده است.
"محمود دولت آبادی
@c_i_gstp
❣آن کس که مثبت می اندیشد برای خودش بسوی آرامـــــش و روشنایی راه می گشاید..
و کسی که منفی نگراست به بدیها و ناآرامی های پیرامونش بال و پر می دهد.
بال و پر دادن به بدیها ما را به سرزمین سیاهی ها و تاریکی ها
می کشاند..
اولین راه برای دوری از تاریکی و تباهی، دوری از افکار منفی است..🍃🍃
@c_i_gstp
در این دوران مدرن میتوان اینطور گفت «برخی به پول خود تکیه میکنند، برخی به شغل خود امید دارند، برخی به آنچه اقتصاددانان میگویند توکل میکنند. اما توکل ما به خدایی است که همهٔ اینها را خلق کرده. نام او خدای تأمینکنندهٔ نیازها است»
@c_i_gstp
هیچکس قویتر از زنی نیست که در فروپاشیدهترین و غمگینانهترین اوضاع جهانش، بلند شده، ظرفها را شسته، خانه را مرتب کرده، به گلها آب داده، به فرزندانش عشق بخشیده، لبخند زده، پناهگاه بوده و خانه را گرم نگه داشته.
هیچکس قویتر از زنی نیست که به کمبودها و نبودها و محدودیتها پشت کرده و با وجود خستگی و مسئولیتهای سنگینی بر دوش، بلند شده، از قافلهی همسالانش جا نمانده و از همقطاران آسودهترش پیشی گرفته.
هیچکس قویتر…
❤3
Signed نوید فرامرزی
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @c_i_gstp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کتاب گویا @ketabegoia · 32,203 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رویش ایده” (@c_i_gstp), 366 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_i_gstp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.