Channel
@c_c_bahrain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002338715063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @c_c_bahrain |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/c_c_bahrain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 70 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 69 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 68 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 68 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (20 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 251 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من أدلّة ولاية الفقيه إنّ صحيحة عمر بن حنظلة تدلّ على ولاية الفقيه، والمناقشات التي قيلت، أو يمكن أن تُقال، حسبما قدّمناه غير واردة ولا مقبولة، فالصّحيحة إذن لا قصور فيها في مجال الاستدلال على هذا الأمر، لا من حيث السّند، ولا من حيث الدّلالة. 📖 آية الله السيد جعفر مرتضى، ولاية الفقيه في صحيحة عمر بن حنظلة، ص٨٠-٨١ #البحرين #ولاية_الفقيه
نظريّة الشيخ الأنصاريّ في ثبوت الولاية للفقيه بمعناها المبحوث عنه - أي: صلاحيّات السّلطة العرفيّة العقلائيّة بالإضافة إلى صلاحيّة الإفتاء والقضاء - واضحة من صريح كلامه من دون أيّ لبس، أو إبهام، أو غموض. 📖 آية الله الشيخ محسن الآراكي، نظريّة الحكم في الإسلام، ص١٩٤ #البحرين #ولاية_الفقيه
هل ولاية الفقيه مثل ولاية فرعون؟!! للفقه الولائيّ دائرة واسعة، وعلى الخصوص في مسألة ولاية الفقيه. أحدهم قال: إنّ ولاية الفقيه مثل ولاية فرعون؛ لأنّه قال: {أَنَا رَبُّكُمْ الأَعْلَى}، وهذا الإنسان لم يفهم الولاية المطلقة على الإطلاق. فالولاية المطلقة التي قد أطلقها السيّد الإمام [الخمينيّ قُدّس سرّه] هي أنّ ولاية رسول الله صلّى الله عليه وآله ثابتة للفقيه بدون قيدٍ؛ لأنّه في السّابق كانت هناك قيود على ولاية الفقيه. …
حرمة الولاية من قِبل الجائر الظّاهر انّه لا خلاف بين الأصحاب في حرمة الولاية من قِبل الجائر في الجملة، وتدلّ عليه الأخبار المستفيضة بل المتواترة، وقد تقدّم بعضها في البحث عن حرمة معونة الظّالمين، كقوله عليه السّلام: "من سوّد اسمه في ديوان وُلد سابع - مقلوب عبّاس - حشره الله يوم القيامة خنزيراً"، وغير ذلك من الرّوايات". 📖 آية الله العظمى السيد أبو القاسم الخوئي، مصباح الفقاهة، ج١، ص٦٦٨ #البحرين #ولاية_الفقيه
رأي الشيخ الأعظم في ولاية الفقيه المهمّ في مسألة ولاية الفقيه، ولايته على الحكومة، وأنّه أولى النّاس بها، فلا يجوز لأحد التّصدّي لهذا الأمر من دون إذنه. وأمّا غير ذلك فهو قليل الابتلاء، حتى في زمن الرّسول الأعظم (ص)، والأئمّة المعصومين (ع)، والولاية على الحكومة فهي ثابتة بأمرين [كما] يظهر من كلامه ظهوراً تامًّا. الأوّل: كلّ أمر تحتاج إليه الأُمّة، ولا يجوز تركه من الأُمور التي لم يؤمر بها فرد معيّن، أو أفراد معيّنون…
Photo, posted without a caption
ولاية الفقيه؛ ولاية دين الله! ولاية الفقيه تعني ولاية الفقاهة أي ولاية الدّين الإسلاميّ الكامل والجامع والإلهيّ، ولذلك فمرجع هذه الولاية وهذه القيمومة هي ولاية الله وقيمومته، وتخلّي العبد عن إرادته في مقابل الله هو مقام تسليمه له تعالى وهذا المقام يُعدُّ غاية كمال الإنسان. 📖 آية الله العظمى الشيخ جوادي آمُلي، ولاية الفقيه: ولاية الفقاهة والعدالة، ص١٨٩ #البحرين #ولاية_الفقيه
🤣1
موارد شمول "ولاية الفقيه" أمّا موارد شمول "ولاية الفقيه" فهي جميع شؤون ولاية النّبيّ (ص) والأئمّة (ع)، تلك الشّؤون القابلة للتّفويض، ممّا يرجع إلى إدارة البلاد وسياسة العباد في جميع أبعاد الكلمة، فالفقيه مرجع الأُمّة في جميع شؤونها التّشريعيّة والقضائيّة والانتظامية، كما كان النّبيّ (ص) والإمام (ع) كذلك على الإطلاق. 📖 العلامة الشيخ محمّد هادي معرفة، ولاية الفقيه، ص١٠٥ #البحرين #ولاية_الفقيه
ولاية الفقيه ومشكلة التّزاحم إذا كان كلّ فقيه يستمدّ ولايته من الله سبحانه، فكلّ من بلغ درجة الاجتهاد وكان جامعاً لشرائط القيادة فله الولاية، فربّما يوجد أفراد كثيرون يتوفّر فيهم هذا الملاك، وهذا يعني تعدّد الولاة في حكومة واحدة؟ والجواب عن ذلك هو أنّ تصدّي الفقيه لأمر الحكومة وكونه موفّقاً في أمره يتوقّف على أمرين: (١) الولاية الشّرعيّة والتي يستمدّها من الله سبحانه. (٢) قبول النّاس وخضوعهم له والتي يعبّر عنه بال…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @c_c_bahrain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 729,171 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الهيئة الثقافية - البحرين” (@c_c_bahrain), 70 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_c_bahrain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.