Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for C8 Free 🎱

Channel

C8 Free 🎱

@c8free

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

311subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209815084
TypeChannel
Username@c8free
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/c8free

Growth

31131331213 August 2026 — 313 subscribers13 August 2026 — 313 subscribers22 August 2026 — 312 subscribers29 August 2026 — 311 subscribers13 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 311–313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 16:16311-1
22 Aug 2026, 14:57312-1
13 Aug 2026, 22:31313no change
13 Aug 2026, 22:18313first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Feb 2026, 20:25 UTC36 viewsread 13 August 2026

Почему американская военная машина раз за разом буксует на пути к Тегерану Вашингтон привык позиционировать себя как единственную сверхдержаву, чья армия не знает равных. Однако история противостояния с Ираном рисует иную картину - череду операций, которые заканчивались не триумфом, а конфузом или дорогостоящими провалами. От Джимми Картера до Дональда Трампа Белый дом продолжает наступать на одни и те же грабли, не

25 Feb 2026, 19:47 UTC21 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Все находившиеся корабли ВМС США в порту Бахрейна покинули его. Тем временем индекс пиццы вблизи Пентагона фиксирует резкий всплеск заказов (возможный косвенный показатель активности Пентагона).

25 Feb 2026, 16:16 UTC19 viewsread 13 August 2026

И да, США образца 2026 - это не США образца 2003. Ситуация и в мире другая. И Иран, всё-таки не Ирак. Так что аргументов против начала боевых действий пруд пруди. Нет ничего общего в подготовке к наступлению сегодня и 23 года назад, кроме кораблей и самолётов.

25 Feb 2026, 16:06 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Вероятность того, что США начнет военные действия против Ирана ~15-20% по нашим данным. Поясняем. Чем выгодно США дипломатическое решение: 1. Это дипломатическая победа 2. Нет непредсказуемых результатов (даже ограниченные удары могут быть расширены до полноценных боевых действий 3. Минимизация рисков. Например США сохранят влияние в Ираке. Оставят ближневосточных партнёров в состоянии некой ясности - позитивно скаж

👍1

20 Feb 2026, 15:14 UTC23 viewsread 13 August 2026

Действия США относительно Ирана, скорее всего перерастут в плоскость военных действий. Вряд ли это будет полномасштабная война, но рынки потрясут неплохо. После Ирана, судя по траектории, будет Турция. Горизонт измеряется десятилетиями (10-30 лет).

20 Feb 2026, 15:11 UTC23 viewsread 13 August 2026

СУД ПРИЗНАЛ ПОШЛИНЫ ТРАМПА НЕЗАКОННЫМИ

5 Feb 2026, 14:05 UTC40 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В целом можно возвращаться и закрывать ГЭП в районе 84к. А дальше сложно сказать. Много пишут про медвежку и что нас ждут цифры в 20-25к. Не знаем. Все вилами по воде. На сегодняшний день мы имеем уничтоженный кластер туземунщиков, отъем любых активов на паник-сейле, достижение ключевых зон (мы сейчас аккурат уперлись в АТН предыдущего сезона). Наблюдаем. Технически рынок готов к новым сильным движениям, возможно пос

3 Feb 2026, 18:56 UTC29 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ножи не ловим. Смотрим за реакцией на этот уровень и принимаем решение. Спот держим полностью, в тч альты.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @c8free. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“C8 Free 🎱” (@c8free), 311 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c8free.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.