Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

c4het

@c4hett

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

215subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002517981951
TypeChannel
Username@c4hett
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/c4hett

Growth

215216215.59 Aug 2026, 21:47 — 216 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 10:48 — 215 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:4710 Aug 2026, 10:48
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 215–216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:48215-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:47216first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.6%
avg views ÷ 215 subscribers
Avg views / post
173
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (15 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,732
Reactions total227
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 33s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

589 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 541596975900919522410217.3%
custom 54431086566252608648113.8%
custom 5206536420532964732579.68%
custom 5296661786638969318539.00%
custom 5415591651563296370518.66%
custom 5305254684758407795386.45%
custom 5429140250452595421315.26%
custom 5221993131657957689305.09%
custom 5215528424193420048284.75%
custom 5415885603419999769264.41%
custom 5307580293585075780254.24%
custom 5382002078140879158193.23%
custom 5429126974708677553132.21%
custom 5373294062013009668122.04%
custom 5404555363729054112111.87%
custom 523561691824472390981.36%
custom 528286911764316542040.679%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 589reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
142
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 19 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @c4hett. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC100 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

сниму шкуру на час ! могу с апельсина , могу с мандарина id : vi1ronn

custom 541559165156329637012custom 54431086566252608648custom 52155284241934200485custom 54159697590091952243custom 52065364205329647321custom 52828691176431654201custom 53052546847584077951custom 54158856034199997691

Signed ً v

5 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC91 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

scp @helpfromd3auuar

custom 544310865662526086413custom 521552842419342004812custom 52966617866389693189custom 53075802935850757802custom 54155916515632963702custom 54158856034199997692

Signed ً v

3 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC191 views21 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

w @g10ryg0d очень крутая песня называется сингл лейдис но неля блядина почему-то не сингл.. думаю вырезать её из коллаба !

custom 53052546847584077958custom 53075802935850757806custom 54431086566252608646custom 52966617866389693181

Signed ً v

2 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC74 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @clam6iryPhoto

🤩озыгрыш на звёзды ☺️ в честь наступающего дня рождения шашлычка мы решили устроить розыгрыш🥳 🤩словия: 🔠 подписка на крембрюле 🔠 подписка на чот 🔠 подписка на горловой 🤩ризы ◾️— 150 ⭐️ ◾️— 100 ⭐️ ◾️— 50 ⭐️ Итоги 16 августа

Signed clam6iry

2 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC117 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

диша опять наделала мне красоты, ну что ж такое!! ❤️

custom 54159697590091952247custom 54158856034199997693

Signed ً saudd

1 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC87 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @g10ryg0d

хочу до конца лета 200 подписчиков, очень-очень, у меня блядский график на заводе, но я все равно пытаюсь делать контентик разнообразный, помогите пажалуста😔😔

Signed ً saudd

1 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC126 viewsread 9 August 2026

каждому новому подписчику она скинет голую фотку!! не мою

Signed ً saudd

23 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC321 views29 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

💃 cc : @g10ryg0d

custom 541596975900919522413custom 54158856034199997697custom 52155284241934200486custom 52966617866389693182custom 54431086566252608641

Signed ً saudd

23 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC290 views36 reactions6 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

ну пока что этим порадуемся

custom 541559165156329637014custom 52219931316579576899custom 53052546847584077956custom 52155284241934200482custom 52966617866389693181custom 54158856034199997691custom 54159697590091952241custom 54291402504525954211

Signed ً saudd

17 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC335 views58 reactions52 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

🤩

custom 542914025045259542122custom 520653642053296473213custom 530525468475840779512custom 54155916515632963703custom 54159697590091952243custom 52155284241934200482custom 52828691176431654202custom 54431086566252608641

Signed ㅤ schztr

11 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC327 views34 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

это темный принц или почему так качает

custom 544310865662526086420custom 54291402504525954217custom 54158856034199997696custom 54155916515632963701

Signed ㅤ schztr

3 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC414 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

харашо

custom 530758029358507578014custom 541596975900919522410custom 52966617866389693188

Signed ㅤ schztr

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @c4hett. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 219,461 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“c4het” (@c4hett), 215 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c4hett.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.