Channel
@c1deutschonline
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
675subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001186701331 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @c1deutschonline |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/c1deutschonline |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @b2deutschonline/30031 Mar 2026, 14:57 UTC | @c1deutschonline/340 · this entry31 Mar 2026, 14:57 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @b2deutschonline/30324 May 2026, 15:48 UTC | @c1deutschonline/343 · this entry24 May 2026, 15:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @b2deutschonline/30711 Jun 2026, 18:14 UTC | @c1deutschonline/353 · this entry12 Jun 2026, 08:31 UTC | 1.00 | 14 hours |
| @c1deutschonline/359 · this entry1 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC | @b2deutschonline/3081 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @b2deutschonline/3106 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC | @c1deutschonline/360 · this entry6 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @b2deutschonline | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @b2deutschonline (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 March 2026 to 6 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @b2deutschonline. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 675 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 674 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 674 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
204 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 185 | 90.7% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 6.37% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.47% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, пока вы отдыхаете, у нас вовсю идёт подготовка к экзаменам! Студенты уровней B2–C1 сейчас активно готовятся к осенней сессии. Всё своё время я сейчас уделяю подготовке к занятиям и проверке письменных работ. Именно поэтому здесь материал выходит не так часто. Вот так выглядит изнанка преподавательских будней.
❤6
Когнитивные барьеры: почему немецкий язык дается тяжело (заметки преподавателя) В своей практике я регулярно вижу студентов, которые месяцами бьются об немецкий язык, но не видят прогресса. Стандартный совет «больше занимайтесь и учите слова» здесь не работает. За мнимой «ленью» или «отсутствием способностей» часто скрываются особенности работы нервной системы, о которых не принято говорить на курсах. Немецкий язык …
❤15
Когда мы проходим собирательные существительные на уровне С1, студенты всегда спрашивают, где в жизни встречаются эти фразы. 1. Политика и СМИ (Ток-шоу, газеты типа Die Zeit) - die protestierende Studentenschaft – протестующее студенчество (как единый протестный организм, а не просто группа студентов). - die Mobilisierung der Wählerschaft - мобилизация электората. Фраза-клише, которая звучит на каждом политическом т…
❤7
В чём разница: stetig vs. stets? 🤔 stetig — постоянный (прилагательное): Wir brauchen eine stetige Verbesserung der Qualität. Синоним: kontinuierlich stets – всегда (наречие): Bei Fragen stehen wir Ihnen stets zur Verfügung. Синонимы: immer, jederzeit, jedes Mal.
❤4
Когда устойчивое выражение in Kraft treten (вступать в силу) превращается в das Inkrafttreten (вступление закона в силу), мы имеем дело с номинализацией (субстантивацией словосочетаний). Морфологический принцип: компоненты синтаксической группы соединяются в одно слово, пишутся с прописной буквы и получают артикль das. Получается отглагольное существительное, обозначающее процесс. · in Frage stellen (ставить …
❤10👍6
Классное выражение, которое сразу поднимет вашу речь на уровень выше: einer Sache (Dat.) Bedeutung beimessen - придавать чему-то значение. Синоним: auf etwas Wert legen. - Wir müssen diesem Projekt mehr Bedeutung beimessen. - Ich messе gesundem Schlaf eine große Bedeutung bei.
❤5👍3🔥3
Наречия с суффиксом –weise Суффикс -weise этимологически восходит к немецкому существительному die Weise (способ действий). Cловообразование выглядит следующим образом: - существительное + -weise: Teil (часть) + -weise = teilweise (частично). - прилагательное + -weise: zufällig (случайный) + -weise = zufälligerweise (случайно). Если производящая основа оканчивается на согласный, между ней и суффиксом ч…
❤14
Слово дня: sich weigern (отказываться) Это возвратный глагол, который чаще всего используется в связке с инфинитивным оборотом zu + Infinitiv. Он означает отказ делать что-либо. Er weigert sich, die Wahrheit zu sagen. Основной синоним: ablehnen (отклонять, отвергать). Но ablehnen чаще используется с существительными (отклонить предложение), а sich weigern - с действиями (отказаться делать что-то). Интересный факт…
❤9
Для тех, кому нужно слать экзамен в августе-сентябре, приглашаю на подготовительный курс. Запись через сайт
Когда я публикую слова и выражения для уровня С1, в комментариях иногда проскакивает мысль: «Зачем это нужно? В реальной жизни так никто не говорит!». Но тут всё зависит от того, что именно мы считаем «реальной жизнью». Если речь идет о бытовых делах, покупках в магазине или заказе пива в баре, то усложнять язык действительно ни к чему - для этого с головой хватает уровня А2-В1. Не зря многие успешно сдают telc B1 и…
❤10
geistig oder geistlich? geistig = умственный, интеллектуальный, психический: geistige Arbeit - умственная работа geistige Entwicklung - умственное развитие geistig fit sein - быть в хорошей умственной форме geistige Fähigkeiten - интеллектуальные способности - Regelmäßiges Lesen hält geistig fit. geistlich = духовный, церковный, религиозный geistliche Musik - духовная музыка geistliche Lieder - церковные песнопения…
❤10👍1
mündlich vs. mündig: в чём разница? Оба слова происходят от der Mund, но значения у них разные: mündlich - устный. Антоним - schriftlich. eine mündliche Prüfung eine mündliche Vereinbarung mündig - совершеннолетний / зрелый. Антоним - unmündig. mündig werden - стать совершеннолетним ein mündiger Bürger - сознательный гражданин
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @c1deutschonline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Немецкий С1 с Екатериной Казанковой” (@c1deutschonline), 675 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c1deutschonline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.