Строю бренд MATRЁSHINA и показываю всё изнутри: принты, производство, решения, ошибки и будни семейного бизнеса.
Учусь упрощать жизнь с ИИ и не откладывать её на потом.
MATRЁSHINA → matreshina.ru
📲@katerina_starchikova
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 487–489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 02:22
488
no change
25 Sept 2026, 01:47
488
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 488 subscribers
Avg views / post
108
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
13 (9 September 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
1,407
Reactions total
195
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
288
Videos
37
Links
76
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
195 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
73
37.4%
🔥
38
19.5%
custom 4920678833423647684
31
15.9%
custom 5314663394735832360
30
15.4%
custom 5314638788868194627
10
5.13%
custom 5269226690898332350
5
2.56%
custom 5312322714868925561
4
2.05%
custom 5314527124013464208
3
1.54%
custom 5375100641221828518
1
0.513%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😻 С котиком, книжечкой, кофе и другими теплыми ассоциациями40%
🌌 абстрактный «ты моя путеводная звезда»52%
🕊️ с птичками44%
☕️ с французским вайбом36%
💃🏼 с силуэтами женщин60%
The shares total 268%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Хочу показать вам 6 идей ко Дню матери и выбрать вместе, какую из них будем делать дальше🍿
Это мои разные задумки, пока только в очень черновых эскизах.
Мне хочется сделать платок про маму без розочек и огромной надписи «ЛУЧШАЯ МАМА НА СВЕТЕ». Чтобы он был современный, красивый, немного fashion и его действительно хотелось носить потом с обычной одеждой. Но чтобы внутри всё равно оставался этот смысл, из-за которог…
У меня уже список из 20 пунктов, что нужно не забыть на фестиваль
И это при том, что «платки» там занимают один пункт. Хотя платков, мягко говоря, не один 🍦
Берём рейл и красивые вешалки, чтобы всё висело нормально и можно было спокойно рассматривать принты, трогать, примерять. Думаю ещё притащить зеркало, потому что выбирать платок без зеркала в пол вообще не тот вайб)
Будет беспроигрышная лотерея. Сегодня как ра…
Я забыла, что такое, когда рабочий день состоит только из работы☕️
Миша почти две недели как пошёл в сад.
Первые пару дней плакал, потом один день вообще не пошёл. На выходных мы снова читали книжки про сад, смотрели малышариков, проводили PR-кампанию как могли🍿
Короче, продавали детский сад собственному ребёнку.
Сработало.
Через неделю уже пришлось объяснять, что сад, к сожалению, закрыт.
К СОЖАЛЕНИЮ😈
Сейчас …
Мы поменяли название и подали заявку на товарный знак MATRЁSHINA🤕
С названием мучились долго. «Матрёшка» занята, вариации вокруг неё тоже. Мы перебрали кучу вариантов, в какой-то момент дошли даже до «Мать Рёшкина» (да🤪), потом написали владельцам товарного знака с просьбой разрешить нам использование, увы.
В итоге появилась MATRЁSHINA. Теперь ждём проверку, результат будет примерно через два месяца.
Очень надеюсь…
А давайте уже увидимся?
26 и 27 сентября мы с MATRЁSHINA будем на @ecofriendlyfest на «Флаконе». Я буду там оба дня, так что приходите знакомиться, болтать и примерять платки🌟
Если давно смотрите на какой-то принт, но непонятно, подойдёт ли он вам, вот и повод проверить. Можно даже прийти в том самом пальто, к которому всё никак не найдётся что-нибудь красивое😔
А можно просто зайти поздороваться. Я буду очень рада…
Проснулась утром, открыла фотоплёнку (ну да, проснулась не до конца) и с ужасом думаю: что я вчера делала? Где была? Я же вроде спать легла😳
Оказалось, никуда я не ходила. Просто вчера с ИИ и примеряла на себя 80-е.
В общем, принесла вам выходной промт поразвлекаться. Прикрепите свою фотографию и напишите:
«Как бы я выглядела в 80-е?»
Скидывайте тоже, что получится, вместе полюбуемся и представим, какую вечеринку…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bymatreshina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
😻 С котиком, книжечкой, кофе и другими теплыми ассоциациями40%
🌌 абстрактный «ты моя путеводная звезда»52%
🕊️ с птичками44%
☕️ с французским вайбом36%
💃🏼 с силуэтами женщин60%
The shares total 268%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MATRЁSHINA 🪆Шёлк и нейросети (бывшее название платки MATRЁSHKA МАТРЁШКА)” (@bymatreshina), 488 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bymatreshina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
