Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 95 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 17:07
241
-2
2 Nov 2026, 11:00
243
+13
25 Oct 2026, 22:47
230
+17
12 Oct 2026, 17:09
213
-2
2 Oct 2026, 08:38
215
-2
13 Sept 2026, 05:59
217
+1
6 Sept 2026, 01:16
216
+1
29 Aug 2026, 18:46
215
-2
22 Aug 2026, 11:16
217
-1
15 Aug 2026, 19:05
218
+3
8 Aug 2026, 10:47
215
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:07
215
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 6208402512295234207
22
23.9%
custom 5267491575650345205
16
17.4%
custom 5242612754249962838
12
13.0%
custom 5242707054551914181
12
13.0%
custom 5249393455343354351
11
12.0%
custom 5404358675701716876
8
8.70%
custom 5255817412158180578
6
6.52%
custom 5240197303297397749
4
4.35%
custom 5443045748239255606
1
1.09%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Этот плед не дает мне покоя уже несколько дней. 🦌🦌
В моем тиктоке буквально каждое второе видео об осенних распаковках, где очень часто стал мелькать плед Бемби из европейского магазина Actions (аналог фикспрайса или фамилии у нас)🥹
Я прошерстила всевозможные магазины у нас в России и не нашла абсолютно ничего🦌 Очень надеюсь, что кто-нибудь все-таки выпустит аналог у нас, поскольку это невероятно уютный и милый пле
Пост-признание в любви коктейлю из мака🥛
Весной вышел новый вкус легендарного молочного коктейля - черешня. Это просто самый лучший вкус!! Нигде вкуснее коктейлей нет кроме мака, у них идеальная консистенция, а главное - они не приторные, а скорее как подтаявшее мороженое!🍒
Первая осенняя покупка🍁
Я дала себе слово не предвкушать осень хотя бы раньше августа, но погода сама настаивает на этом!!☕️🍩
В общем, я вступаю в эру романтизации осени и жду ее с нетерпением!
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @bychrw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“by Sveta🪽” (@bychrw), 241 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bychrw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
