Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

бемо — digital агентство

@bybemo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002435348192
TypeChannel
Username@bybemo
Created19 November 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bybemo

Growth

3012 Aug 2026, 12:47 — 30 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 09:27 — 30 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 12:4713 Aug 2026, 09:27
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:2730no change
12 Aug 2026, 12:4730first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 19 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2151.2%
👨‍💻819.5%
🤓717.1%
🤯512.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2024 to 15 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 7 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bybemo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 November 2024 to 15 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Mar 2025, 14:19 UTC471 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

tone of voice: как бренд говорит так, чтобы его услышали? tone of voice (ToV), или голос бренда, — это не просто текст на сайте или в рекламе. это душа бренда, которая проглядывает в каждом слове и сообщении. представьте: вы делаете компанию с нуля — от идеи до готового продукта. и вот на этапе, когда надо показать себя миру, возникает вопрос: «как будем говорить с людьми?». тут и вступает в игру tone of voice — он

🤓5

21 Mar 2025, 08:47 UTC352 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

уникальные элементы для школы английского языка с методикой обучения real-life practice разработано в бемо

🤯3

19 Mar 2025, 11:36 UTC345 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

цвет как голос дизайна: почему колористика решает? для нас дизайн — это не просто работа, а способ рассказать историю через каждую деталь. одна из ключевых деталей, без которой ничего не заиграет — это колористика. цвет в дизайне — это не просто выбор "красивого" оттенка из палитры. это инструмент, который формирует восприятие, создает настроение и помогает проекту заговорить с аудиторией на одном языке подумайте с

👨‍💻4🤓2

3 Mar 2025, 09:40 UTC427 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

почему framer — это новый уровень удобства? мы делаем проекты, которые начинаются с идеи, а заканчиваются разработкой. Как раз на последнем этапе возникает вопрос: «что выбираем: tilda или framer?». вот в чем заключается различие: tilda — это как швейцарский нож для лендингов. быстро, просто, дизайн-решения из figma переносятся в жизнь без лишних телодвижений. но когда речь заходит о чем-то большем — адаптивность, с

👨‍💻43🤯2

23 Feb 2025, 13:03 UTC425 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

наши инструменты в работе дизайн. figma — любимая программа наших ребят. вместе делаем интерфейсы, стратегии и мини-анимации разработка. tilda подойдет для лендингов и небольших сайтов, можно быстро и эффективно реализовать свои дизайн-решения на практике framer — вариант для тех, кому нужно сделать адаптивный сайт под смелую задачу. если понадобится внедрение сложных функций — добро пожаловать в разработку на коде

6

13 Feb 2025, 12:21 UTC409 views7 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

привет. команда «бемо» в телеграм! мы делаем маркетинговые исследования с глубоким погружением в бизнес, брендинг со смыслом, дизайн с продуктовым мышлением и разработку с внедрением сложных решений. — помогали собрать инвестиции от СберАкселлератор — делали брендинг для фестиваля под финансированием Томской области — создали сертификаты и рецепты в ОптикЮ (топ-1 оптика в Ростове) и другие крупные проекты интересн

7

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @bybemo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 664,479 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“бемо — digital агентство” (@bybemo), 30 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bybemo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.