2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 09:45
132
no change
15 Aug 2026, 09:32
132
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
380.1%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
502
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held
14 (23 March 2026 – 23 July 2026)
Views total
1,505
Reactions total
62
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
38
Links
28
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
292 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89
30.5%
👍
69
23.6%
🔥
42
14.4%
😱
24
8.22%
🤯
18
6.16%
👀
16
5.48%
🤝
9
3.08%
😨
8
2.74%
👌
7
2.40%
🤔
4
1.37%
❤🔥
2
0.685%
🤨
2
0.685%
💊
1
0.342%
😁
1
0.342%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
682
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 13 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
97
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @byactionorg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ЗША ўсё часцей адмаўляюць беларусам у прытулку
Паводле звестак аналітычнага маніторынгу ByAction, доля ўхваленых запытаў на палітычны прытулак для беларусаў у іміграцыйных судах ЗША няўхільна падае з ліпеня 2025 года.
Невялікі перапынак у гэтым падзенні быў у кастрычніку 2025 года, калі беларускія Дэмакратычныя сілы і сродкі масавай інфармацыі прыцягнулі ўвагу грамадства да затрымання беларусаў у ЗША. Але пасля кар…
Беларусаў дэпартуюць у Беліз
Мы шукаем інфармацыю пра грамадзян Беларусі, якім іміграцыйны суд у Каліфорніі прызначыў дэпартацыю ў Беліз.
Нам дакладна вядома пра два выпадкі ў аднаго іміграцыйнага суддзі. Калі вы валодаеце якой-небудзь інфармацыяй пра гэтыя ці падобныя рашэнні, калі ласка, звяжыцеся з намі.
Будзем удзячныя за вашую дапамогу!
З павагай, валанцёры ByAction
email: [email protected]
Tel: 971-901-0…
Праваабарончы цэнтр „Вясна“ падрыхтаваў новы даклад „Схаваныя рэпрэсіі ў Беларусі 2020–2026“
Даследаванне аналізуе, як за апошнія шэсць гадоў кардынальна змяніўся характар пераследу ў краіне. Раней улады дзейнічалі максімальна паказальна, але ў апошнія гады тактыка рэжыму змянілася. Знешні спакой у краіне з’яўляецца ілюзіяй, за якой хаваецца жорсткі і глыбокі ціск.
Мы настойліва просім вас азнаёміцца з гэтым даслед…
Паводле паведамленняў адміністрацыі прэзыдэнта ЗША, вызваленне палітычных зняволеных «адкладзена на некаторы час».
У сувязі з гэтым, валанцёры ByAction настойліва рэкамендуюць азнаёміцца з даследаваннем BELPOL «Пра рэальны маштаб палітычных рэпрэсій у Беларусі».
Гэтая справаздача дапамагае глыбей зразумець маштабы і сістэмны характар пераследу, з якім па палітычных матывах сёння працягваюць сутыкацца грамадзяне Бел…
Яўген Ждановіч, лідар валанцёрскай службы ByAction, разам са сваёй камандай балатуецца ў Каардынацыйную раду ад спіса №5 „Аб'яднаная грамадзянская платформа“.
Галоўная мэта Яўгена Ждановіча — адвакацыя інтарэсаў беларусаў у ЗША, абарона нашых правоў і дасягненне справядлівага стаўлення, каб вярнуць нам пачуццё бяспекі і веру ў будучыню.
Сярод доўгатэрміновых мэт Ждановіча — умацаванне дэмакратычных інстытутаў, разв…
Belarus Freedom Forum падрыхтаваў заяву і рэкамендацыі для Кангрэса ЗША адносна рэпрэсіўнага апарату Рэспублікі Беларусь. Мы, валанцёры ByAction.org, мелі гонар прыняць удзел у падрыхтоўцы гэтага дакумента.
Нядаўнія ўмоўныя вызваленні палітвязняў, хоць і далі пэўную гуманітарную палёгку, але гэта не вырашэнне існуючых праблем. Нам патрэбныя сістэмныя рэформы, каб дэмантаваць рэпрэсіўны апарат і спыніць сістэматычны …
ICE обязано сообщать консульствам о задержании граждан некоторых стран
Многие не знают, что если ICE задерживает иностранного гражданина, оно может уведомить консульство страны его гражданства.
Для граждан некоторых стран такое уведомление является обязательным. Это означает, что ICE должно сообщить консульству о задержании человека независимо от его желания или согласия (Mandatory Consular Notification).
Согласно…
Сёння быў вызвалены беларус, які правёў пад вартай больш за шэсць месяцаў.
Мы выказваем удзячнасць Ураду ЗША за прадастаўлены прытулак нашаму суайчынніку.
За кожнай перамогай стаіць унёсак многіх прафесіяналаў, неабыякавых людзей, а таксама нашай каманды валанцёраў. Гэта вынік зладжанай сумеснай працы, якую мы вельмі цэнім. Як кажуць, у перамогі шмат бацькоў, а паражэнне заўсёды сірата.
Мы свядома не раскрываем ім…
Мы шукаем Data Engineer (валанцёра або кансультанта). Далучайцеся!
Калі ў вас ёсць досвед працы з ETL/ELT, data pipelines, data modeling, Python, NoSQL, ClickHouse, Redis, Airbyte, Apache Airflow - калі ласка, напішыце ці дазваніце нам. Калі вы ведаеце такога чалавека, калі ласка, перашліце яму гэты пост.
Мы працуем над аналітычнай сістэмай, якая дапамагае беларусам у крытычных сітуацыях. Гэта рэальны інструмент, я…
3 красавіка 2026 года суд Ушацкага раёна Віцебскай вобласці прызнаў Instagram-акаўнт валанцёрскай ініцыятывы ByAction экстрэмісцкімі матэрыяламі.
Раней, 5 сакавіка 2026 года, суд Цэнтральнага раёна Мінска прыняў падобнае рашэнне адносна сайта, электроннай пошты, Telegram-канал і Threads, і кантакт у Signal ініцыятывы ByAction.
Папярэджваем пра рызыкі і магчымую небяспеку падпіскі і супрацоўніцтва з валанцёрамі ByAc…
Беларусы Нью-Ёрка і валанцёры ByAction віншуюць усіх з Днём Волі!
Няхай свабода, праўда і салідарнасць застаюцца з намі кожны дзень. Будзьма беларусамі!
Жыве Беларусь! 🇧🇾
❤16🔥8👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @byactionorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,444,601 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ByAction - валанцёрская ініцыятыва ў ЗША” (@byactionorg), 132 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/byactionorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
