Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DTIYS|✧𝚃𝚘𝚛𝚢𝚌𝚑𝚑𝚑✧

Channel

DTIYS|✧𝚃𝚘𝚛𝚢𝚌𝚑𝚑𝚑✧

@by_torychhh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

106subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002297879237
TypeChannel
Username@by_torychhh
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/by_torychhh

Growth

106107106.58 August 2026 — 107 subscribers9 August 2026 — 107 subscribers16 August 2026 — 106 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106–107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:27106-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:16107no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:16107first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.2%
avg views ÷ 106 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.4
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total709
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52605065114230771332530.5%
custom 54429854898481177631923.2%
custom 54629136914249535291923.2%
custom 544284095560867360778.54%
custom 541369766118008488767.32%
custom 541339081583155762544.88%
custom 534598442226709249022.44%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC24 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ОГРОМНОЕ СПАСИБО @PASHA_Adidas42 ЗА КРУТОЙ ЭДИТ С ШОНОМ 😏

custom 54429854898481177637custom 54629136914249535293custom 54428409556086736072

7 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC42 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔣🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔣 🙂💙🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 💙💙СМОТРЕТЬ В TikTok — [ ТЫК ] • «Сновидение» 2 серия уже вышла! — Увы, мы немного не успели по графику и серия вышла чутка позже, чем планировалось. Также сразу просим прощения, если она вышла короткой и скучной, по ходу дела мы поняли, что в сценарии у нас были несостыковки со всем сюжетом и нам пришлось поменять пару моментов, но третья серия выйдет длиннее и намного интереснее!! Думаю, пр

custom 52605065114230771336custom 54136976611800848875custom 54629136914249535295

7 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC41 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Ещё такой вот интересный вопрос. Следите ли вы за нашим сериалом? Ждете проду? Как вам ваще?

  1. Активно слежу, очень нравится57%
  2. Слежу просто потому что хочется узнать, во что это может превратиться, но мне не интересно29%
  3. Не слежу, не интересно14%
  4. Не слежу, но жду пока выйдет больше контента, а потом посмотрю все разом43%
  5. Слежу просто чтобы продвигать вас, может кому-то другому будет интересно, но не мне29%

The shares total 172%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC38 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Время 6 утра, пол седьмого, мы почти закончили. ↔️развернуть, если интересно почитать мои мысли и ощущения от второй серии ↔️ Изначально сценарий 2 серии был немного другой, но из-за сюжетной несостыковки и технических шоколадок мы приняли решение на ходу переделать немного пару моментов. В наших головах вторая серия выглядела иначе, чем она выйдет в итоге, но это не значит, что мы над ней не старались.. Мы пиздецки

custom 53459844222670924902custom 52605065114230771331custom 54133908158315576251custom 54136976611800848871custom 54429854898481177631custom 54629136914249535291

6 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026

Признайтесь честно, вот прям честно, не смотря на всё что происходит у вас в лоре, кто ваш главный любимчик среди всех персонажей и почему?

6 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC42 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Думаю, на это можно даже тут ответить. Шон. Раньше он создавался, как в некотором роде отражение меня в прошлом, все его загоны и тд. В дальнейшем персонаж морально вырос и перестал быть тупым суицидником, которому лишь бы порезать свои ручки и ножки. У него появилась интересная история, продуманная семья, в будущем отношения, брак и тд. Сейчас мне больше всего в нём нравится характер и дизайн (пусть он и довольно пр

custom 52605065114230771334custom 54429854898481177632custom 54428409556086736071

6 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Раз уж на то пошло, немного пощитпостим. Пишите в анонку че хотите. Самые интересные тейки буду репостить. Можете задавать вопросы насчет меня, моих персонажей, сюжета. На все, что получится, отвечу. @by_torychhh_anonim_bot И не бойтесь, бот полностью анонимный, даже если я захочу, я не смогу узнать, кто мне написал. (К слову, для меня это выглядит как на скрине, все полностью анонимно)

custom 52605065114230771332

6 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC37 viewsread 9 August 2026

ХАХАХАХА БЛЯТЬ.. я и забыла, что у меня вообще анонка есть

6 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026

Обоже фу продажная фури художница нарисовала эльфа, спиздила дизайн с популярного персонажа с огромной фанбазой из лофд, еще и пытается его продать и скрыть свои проебы перекраской персонажа, боже фу отписка дизлайк пошла нахуй Торч.

6 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC42 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

! НЕ АКТУАЛЬНО! Есть еще такой вариант, просто цвет поменяла одним фильтром, если надо будет могу и отрисовать доп арт с ± такой палитрой ( чтоб не сравнивали с Эграсселем💔) Можете писать ставки на тот вариант, на который хотите либо сюда либо под пост с аукционом. Под какой вариант напишите ставки, тот и получите Золото ( которое тут синее) могу заменить на серебро, если будет спрос на такую палитру

6 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Флуд здесь! Там и в посте ниже только ставки.

custom 52605065114230771333

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @by_torychhh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Ещё такой вот интересный вопрос. Следите ли вы за нашим сериалом? Ждете проду? Как вам ваще?

  1. Активно слежу, очень нравится57%
  2. Слежу просто потому что хочется узнать, во что это может превратиться, но мне не интересно29%
  3. Не слежу, не интересно14%
  4. Не слежу, но жду пока выйдет больше контента, а потом посмотрю все разом43%
  5. Слежу просто чтобы продвигать вас, может кому-то другому будет интересно, но не мне29%

The shares total 172%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 350,346 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DTIYS|✧𝚃𝚘𝚛𝚢𝚌𝚑𝚑𝚑✧” (@by_torychhh), 106 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/by_torychhh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.