Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for новгородочка

Channel

новгородочка

@by_novgorodochka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

117subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211847838
TypeChannel
Username@by_novgorodochka
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/by_novgorodochka

Growth

116117116.57 August 2026 — 116 subscribers9 August 2026 — 116 subscribers15 August 2026 — 117 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:26117+1
9 Aug 2026, 05:17116no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:46116first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6154.0%
custom 54292776249815384301916.8%
custom 5429164809075574615108.85%
💯76.19%
👍54.42%
😁43.54%
custom 543148528971128993332.65%
🥰32.65%
😢10.885%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC30 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Господа знакоты волынкеры, общий сбор: в чем перевозите ваши волынки? Мой самостоятельно сшитый волынко-мешочек за два года поистрепался, хочу подобрать более убедительную замену ему, ибо таскать упакованную волынку и прочее сопутствующее в шоппере уже устала

3custom 54314852897112899333custom 54292776249815384302

6 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC44 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fox_beard_booksPoll

О чем Аня вещает, сидя на кортах?

  1. О семках21%
  2. О ноже в печень21%
  3. О житиях32%
  4. О Бонде с кнопкой32%
  5. О том, что Новгород - её территория)64%

The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC44 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fox_beard_booksPhoto

Ладно, у меня тоже есть всратые фото друзей с ФФ)) Как думаете, о чем Анечка так эмоционально дискутирует, сидя на кортах и в спортивном костюме?))

10

6 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fox_beard_booksVideo

В этом году мы собрали на Фэнтези Фест собственный палаточный лагерь с друзьями! Часть группы на таком большом фестивале с палаточный жизнью были в первый раз! Нам было очень весело и кайфово! 🔥🔥🔥 Нашим друзьям, ну, эм, тоже 😁 Видео не пропагандирует ничего кроме юмора)) #фэнтезифест #отдых #фестиваль

custom 54292776249815384305

5 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC52 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А потом я нашла очень красивую ткань, из которой хотела бы сшить ципао, но стоит она как крыло от самолета 🫠

6😢1

5 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC52 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ладушки, сюда тоже выложу - подружечки говорят, симпатично получилось (это всë новая шапка, точно вам говорю) Это я сестру в баблтишную водила, потом гуляли-болтали и дурачились:З

11👍3custom 54291648090755746153

4 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC59 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

"Он украл с неба ясный месяц И спустил ладьею на волны. Он приходит с ночным приливом, У него весло из оливы. Ты меня ждала на причале, Не смыкала очей ночами, Он увидел тебя, голубка, И забыл о вечности Дьявол"

8👍2

3 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC61 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Еще подудели с Олей и Витей в три волынки, а барабанер Фëдор, подойдя чуть позже, стал заведовать ритмом в нашем тогда уже квартете хд Много болтали, шутили, играли "средневековые бэнгеры", получилось забавно) и здорово, что гельветики поддержали нас танцами 😌 Наверное мне вот именно такого чего-то в музыкальной жизни не хватало, веселого и кайфового (надо только репертуар разнообразить 🤣), чтобы вспомнить, почему

custom 542927762498153843010custom 54291648090755746154

3 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC56 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А что было на ФФ? У моей дорогой подруги Катюши Кожевниковой проходила презентация второй книжечки - "Мëда полыни", по Катиным книгам есть много крутого мерча, открыточки, свечи, потрясающая фотосессия и буктрейлер по первой книжке Катя безумно интересную презентацию книги проводит, рассказывает о том, откуда что взялось, без спойлеров презентует книги и подсвечивает их интересные особенности, опирается на этнограф

8🥰3custom 54292776249815384302

3 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC63 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Оффтоп: в меня такое количество людей верит, что мне уже стыдно самой в себя не верить

💯71

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @by_novgorodochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

О чем Аня вещает, сидя на кортах?

  1. О семках21%
  2. О ноже в печень21%
  3. О житиях32%
  4. О Бонде с кнопкой32%
  5. О том, что Новгород - её территория)64%

The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“новгородочка” (@by_novgorodochka), 117 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/by_novgorodochka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.